Treatment success of internet-based vestibular rehabilitation in general practice: development and internal validation of a prediction model

Abstract

ObjectivesTo develop and internally validate prediction models to assess treatment success of both stand-alone and blended online vestibular rehabilitation (VR) in patients with chronic vestibular syndrome.DesignSecondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.Setting59 general practices in The Netherlands.Participants202 adults, aged 50 years and older with a chronic vestibular syndrome who received either stand-alone VR (98) or blended VR (104). Stand-alone VR consisted of a 6-week, internet-based intervention with weekly online sessions and daily exercises. In blended VR, the same intervention was supplemented with physiotherapy support.Main outcome measuresSuccessful treatment was defined as: clinically relevant improvement of (1) vestibular symptoms (≥3 points improvement Vertigo Symptom Scale—Short Form); (2) vestibular-related disability (>11 points improvement Dizziness Handicap Inventory); and (3) both vestibular symptoms and vestibular-related disability. We assessed performance of the predictive models by applying calibration plots, Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics, area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and applied internal validation.ResultsImprovement of vestibular symptoms, vestibular-related disability or both was seen in 121, 81 and 64 participants, respectively. We generated predictive models for each outcome, resulting in different predictors in the final models. Calibration for all models was adequate with non-significant Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics, but the discriminative ability of the final predictive models was poor (AUC 0.54 to 0.61). None of the identified models are therefore suitable for use in daily general practice to predict treatment success of online VR.ConclusionIt is difficult to predict treatment success of internet-based VR and it remains unclear who should be treated with stand-alone VR or blended VR. Because we were unable to develop a useful prediction model, the decision to offer stand-alone or blended VR should for now be based on availability, cost effectiveness and patient preference.Trial registration numberThe Netherlands Trial Register NTR5712.

Wearable sensor and smartphone assisted vestibular physical therapy for multiple sclerosis: usability and outcomes

“…Technological advances, such as wearable technologies linked to electronic records present opportunities for addressing the problems of symptom control and improved adherence to prescribed exercise programs. Web based VPT has been shown to be effective in chronic dizziness ( 20 , 21 ) but does not address the problem of accurately measuring adherence or providing biofeedback during exercise. Sensors such as accelerometers, and gyroscopes allow human physiological signals to be encoded and recorded, allowing health professionals to measure patient exercise performance and adherence in ways that were not possible previously.…”

Web‐based vestibular rehabilitation in persistent postural‐perceptual dizziness

“…Web‐based VR is an approach available in English and Dutch versions. Randomized trials have shown that web‐based VR, standing alone or combined with face‐to‐face physiotherapy support, is safe and clinically effective (Geraghty et al., 2017 , 2014 ; van Vugt et al., 2017 , 2019 , 2020 ). These RCTs have recruited primary care participants with a relatively low symptom burden (van Vugt et al., 2017 ; Yardley et al., 2004 ).…”

Efectividad de los protocolos aplicados en los programas de rehabilitación vestibular en pacientes con hipofunción vestibular periférica en Instituciones de salud. Año 2021

“…Es difícil predecir, si el modelo de rehabilitación vestibular que incluye ejercicios terapéuticos más intervención basada en internet o el modelo que incluye además al fisioterapeuta, es el que tiene más éxito para la rehabilitación del síndrome vestibular crónico por hipofunción vestibular (89), está demostrado que ambos modelos son clínicamente efectivos y seguros (90).…”