2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment with granulocyte colony–stimulating factor for mobilization of bone marrow cells in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
2
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
47
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is partly contradicted by the study by Kuethe et al, who used gated SPECT to assess the changes in wall perfusion and wall motion score and radionuclide ventriculography to evaluate the evolution of ejection fraction in patients treated by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor compared with a placebo group. They registered a significant improvement in both wall motion and perfusion scores in the treated patients, together with a significant increase in ejection fraction, whilst the patients under placebo therapy showed neither perfusion nor functional improvements [120]. Most recently, Beeres et al used gated SPECT to examine the effect of intramyocardial injection of autologous bone marrow-derived cells on perfusion and function in patients with severe, drug-refractory chronic ischaemia [121].…”
Section: Gated Spect For the Evaluation Of Left Ventricular Volumes Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conclusion is partly contradicted by the study by Kuethe et al, who used gated SPECT to assess the changes in wall perfusion and wall motion score and radionuclide ventriculography to evaluate the evolution of ejection fraction in patients treated by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor compared with a placebo group. They registered a significant improvement in both wall motion and perfusion scores in the treated patients, together with a significant increase in ejection fraction, whilst the patients under placebo therapy showed neither perfusion nor functional improvements [120]. Most recently, Beeres et al used gated SPECT to examine the effect of intramyocardial injection of autologous bone marrow-derived cells on perfusion and function in patients with severe, drug-refractory chronic ischaemia [121].…”
Section: Gated Spect For the Evaluation Of Left Ventricular Volumes Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early clinical trials have demonstrated that G-CSF treatments show beneficial effects to improve cardiac function and myocardial perfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) [9][10][11][12][13] and chronic ischemic heart disease 14,15) . Although three subsequent double-blind placebo-controlled trials showed that G-CSF therapy failed to improve left ventricular restoration in AMI patients 16) , recent metaanalysis suggested that G-CSF may potentially benefit AMI patients with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction at baseline and when therapy is initiated early 17) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encouraged by pre-clinical data, the first clinical trials to evaluate the feasibility and safety of G-CSF appeared in 2004/2005. G-CSF was utilized to mobilize stem cells and/or treat patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [22][23][24] and confirmed that this new type of treatment could be tested with a minimum of security, although some adverse effects were proposed [25].…”
Section: Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b). Initially, as requested, clinical investigations were performed with a limited number of patients, with or without a placebo group and in an openlabel or single-blind design [22][23][24][25][26][27]. All confirmed the safety and feasibility of G-CSF treatment.…”
Section: Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%