“…Ideally, meta-analysis relies primarily on results of well-designed, randomized, controlled therapeutic trials, and attempts to combine fi ndings from studies that appear to be comparable. Typically, the results of individual trials are weighted, usually by the numbers of subjects and sometimes also for measurement variance, to produce an overall, pooled, estimate of effect size that can be a rate ratio (RR; such as response rates based on attaining a criterion [typically ³ 50%] of improvement with drug vs. placebo) or an outcome difference, such as difference in response rate (RD) between a drug and placebo control (the reciprocal of which is the number-needed-to-treat [NNT] to produce an effect superior to that associated with placebo, or the numberneeded-to-harm [NNH] in the case of an adverse effect as the outcome), or difference in percentage change on a standard symptom rating scale [ 110 ] .…”