2018
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2017-0177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree biomass allometry during the early growth of Norway spruce (Picea abies) varies between pure stands and mixtures with European beech (Fagus sylvatica)

Abstract: Tree biomass allometry during the early growth of Norway spruce (Picea abies( AbstractIn this paper we report an investigation of how forest stand mixture may affect biomass allometric relationships in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst). Analysis of aboveground biomass data was conducted for 50 trees. Twenty-five sample trees were from a pure Norway spruce stand and the remainder were taken from a mixed stand of Norway spruce with European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). ANCOVA results demonstrated that indivi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, inclusion of H in the model would be of no value if D and H were perfectly correlated. Although D and H are always correlated to some degree, their relationship varies greatly (Feldpausch et al, 2010), being influenced by genotype, competition and environmental conditions (Egbäck et al, 2015;Hulshof et al, 2015;Dutcă et al, 2018b). As a result, including H in allometric models has been shown to improve biomass prediction accuracy (Chave et al, 2005(Chave et al, , 2014Feldpausch et al, 2012;Fayolle et al, 2013;Rutishauser et al, 2013;Dutcă et al, 2018a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, inclusion of H in the model would be of no value if D and H were perfectly correlated. Although D and H are always correlated to some degree, their relationship varies greatly (Feldpausch et al, 2010), being influenced by genotype, competition and environmental conditions (Egbäck et al, 2015;Hulshof et al, 2015;Dutcă et al, 2018b). As a result, including H in allometric models has been shown to improve biomass prediction accuracy (Chave et al, 2005(Chave et al, , 2014Feldpausch et al, 2012;Fayolle et al, 2013;Rutishauser et al, 2013;Dutcă et al, 2018a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drivers of site specificity in allometric models are H-D ratio, biomass allocation pattern (to vegetative organs) wood density, and these three are moderated by genotype [41], competition [42][43][44] and environmental conditions [27,[45][46][47]. Therefore, it can be expected that unique stand-level interactions between genotype, competition and environmental factors will influence H-D ratios, biomass allocation patterns and wood densities, and such stand level effects will be further reflected by the site-specificity of biomass allometric models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our sample, for any constant diameter, the H-D ratio was found to vary between sites (ICC = 0.77), thus strongly indicating that tree height was responsible for the high site-specificity of stem biomass component. In contrast, branch and needle biomass are less dependent on H-D ratio and may be more sensitive to competition with the neighbouring trees [42,49], which is why they exhibit greater within stand variability and, consequently, are less prone site-specific effects when modelled.…”
Section: Why Did Site-specificity Vary Between the Different Biomass mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two characteristics (i.e. tree architecture and wood density) are modulated by genotype [5] , tree competition [6] and environmental conditions [7] . Since wood density is inherently species specific and because the current dataset involves only one tree species, the sampling strategy has been focused on tree architecture only.…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%