2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree cavity abundance and beyond: Nesting and food storing sites of the pygmy owl in managed boreal forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aspen trees are inhabited by epiphytic bryophytes and lichens (Kuusinen, 1994;Gustafsson and Eriksson, 1995;Hazell, 1998;Pykälä et al, 2006), pathogens (Callan, 1998), herbivorous invertebrates (Robinson et al, 2012), mammals such as the flying squirrel (Pteromys volans; Hanski, 1998;Remm et al 2017) and birds such as woodpeckers and owls (Hågvar et al, 1990;Angelstam and Mikusinski, 1994;Tikkanen et al, 2006;Hardenbol et al 2019). Secondary hole-nesters, including many tits, flycatchers, owls, ducks and flying squirrels, are dependent on cavities excavated by woodpeckers (Martin and Eadie, 1999;Baroni et al 2020). Aspen leaf litter is utilised by, for example, gastropods (Suominen et al, 2003), and dead and decaying aspen trunks provide a suitable habitat for myriad 4 polypore fungi (Kotiranta and Niemelä, 1981;Hynynen and Viherä-Aarnio, 1999;Junninen et al, 2007) and saproxylic invertebrate species (Siitonen and Martikainen, 1994;Martikainen, 2001;Dahlberg and Stokland, 2004;Halme et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aspen trees are inhabited by epiphytic bryophytes and lichens (Kuusinen, 1994;Gustafsson and Eriksson, 1995;Hazell, 1998;Pykälä et al, 2006), pathogens (Callan, 1998), herbivorous invertebrates (Robinson et al, 2012), mammals such as the flying squirrel (Pteromys volans; Hanski, 1998;Remm et al 2017) and birds such as woodpeckers and owls (Hågvar et al, 1990;Angelstam and Mikusinski, 1994;Tikkanen et al, 2006;Hardenbol et al 2019). Secondary hole-nesters, including many tits, flycatchers, owls, ducks and flying squirrels, are dependent on cavities excavated by woodpeckers (Martin and Eadie, 1999;Baroni et al 2020). Aspen leaf litter is utilised by, for example, gastropods (Suominen et al, 2003), and dead and decaying aspen trunks provide a suitable habitat for myriad 4 polypore fungi (Kotiranta and Niemelä, 1981;Hynynen and Viherä-Aarnio, 1999;Junninen et al, 2007) and saproxylic invertebrate species (Siitonen and Martikainen, 1994;Martikainen, 2001;Dahlberg and Stokland, 2004;Halme et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantifying the total response of pygmy owls is a challenging task because of a lack of data on the real numbers of prey species available in the field on one hand and incomplete information on the amount of food stored in undiscovered stores in natural tree cavities on the other. In our study area, natural cavities in trees were only very seldom used as food stores (Baroni et al 2020). The obtained result is thus an approximation of the real consumption by pygmy owls on these species, but we consider that it anyway reflects interspecific differences between prey species and its among-year variation in relation to the vole abundance.…”
Section: Total Response Of Pygmy Owlsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The use of partially rotten prey items by owls has been shown before (Roulin, 2004), but we are not aware of any previous study on the possible detrimental effects that eating rotten food could have on avian and mammalian predators. Pygmy owls have been shown to clean old nest material from the boxes before the breeding season (Baroni, Korpimäki, Selonen, & Laaksonen, 2020). It is therefore possible that rotten prey items are not consumed but thrown away, but this was never observed during inspection of food hoards in early spring in the surroundings of the hoard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%