2018
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree crown overlap improves predictions of the functional neighbourhood effects on tree survival and growth

Abstract: Investigations of forest community structure and dynamics have been facilitated by the use of neighbourhood models that examine the interactions between a focal tree and its neighbours using a fixed radius. However, different studies have chosen different radii without clear reasons, hampering the understanding of mechanisms structuring tree communities. Using functional trait and tree demography data from the Luquillo subtropical forest in Puerto Rico, we compared fixed‐neighbourhood models with a canopy over… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(86 reference statements)
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, SPPA focus on interactions between individuals’ centroids at a certain range of spatial scales defined by the user and integrates multiple above‐ and below‐ground processes. Therefore, OAA should not be regarded as a substitute for SPPA but as an alternative, more appropriate to assess canopy interactions (McIntire & Fajardo, ; Zambrano et al, ) that remain elusive for current spatial tools. OAA should be employed whenever the crown or the mass of individuals of different species could overlap with one another, and where the individual crowns could be outlined as a bidimensional polygon, for example, biphasic vegetation‐bare soil communities (alpine, subalpine and Arctic areas, sand dunes, drylands, salt pans, gypsum and other specialized soils), shrubland, vertically structured forest stands (see Figure for more details).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, SPPA focus on interactions between individuals’ centroids at a certain range of spatial scales defined by the user and integrates multiple above‐ and below‐ground processes. Therefore, OAA should not be regarded as a substitute for SPPA but as an alternative, more appropriate to assess canopy interactions (McIntire & Fajardo, ; Zambrano et al, ) that remain elusive for current spatial tools. OAA should be employed whenever the crown or the mass of individuals of different species could overlap with one another, and where the individual crowns could be outlined as a bidimensional polygon, for example, biphasic vegetation‐bare soil communities (alpine, subalpine and Arctic areas, sand dunes, drylands, salt pans, gypsum and other specialized soils), shrubland, vertically structured forest stands (see Figure for more details).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained with the overlapping area analysis (OAA) in a cryophilic pasture of the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park Table 1 above-and below-ground processes. Therefore, OAA should not be regarded as a substitute for SPPA but as an alternative, more appropriate to assess canopy interactions (McIntire & Fajardo, 2009;Zambrano et al, 2019) that remain elusive for current spatial tools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A more biologically relevant measure of neighborhoods is to consider that neighborhoods based upon the physical overlap of crowns and/or root systems such that there is no fixed neighborhood radius (Lebrija‐Trejos, Wright, Hernandez, & Reich, 2014; Zambrano et al, 2019). In the Luquillo subtropical forest in Puerto Rico, the neighborhood models using crown overlap had better support than traditional models with fixed radius, suggesting that the traditional models with the fixed radius may not have a full picture of competitive interaction (Zambrano et al, 2019). So far crown overlap is a reasonable, although imperfect, measure for neighborhood interactions in terms of light and water resource competition, and this result giving us an idea of how to corporate whole tree allocation strategies in neighborhood models with traits.…”
Section: Size‐related Changes In Trait‐assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As density-dependent effects have been traditionally studied using a fixed neighbourhood size to capture the interactions between seedlings and their neighbours (Comita et al, 2009;Bai et al, 2012;Johnson et al, 2017), such an approach does, in our opinion, not fully account for the fact that the processes underlying these interactions may operate at different spatial scales (Zambrano et al, 2019;Zambrano et al, 2020). For instance, the spatial scale of neighbourhoods over which seedlings experience density-dependent effects may differ among species (Queenborough et al, 2007), and likely also among plants of different sizes and growth forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%