“…In contrast, SPPA focus on interactions between individuals’ centroids at a certain range of spatial scales defined by the user and integrates multiple above‐ and below‐ground processes. Therefore, OAA should not be regarded as a substitute for SPPA but as an alternative, more appropriate to assess canopy interactions (McIntire & Fajardo, ; Zambrano et al, ) that remain elusive for current spatial tools. OAA should be employed whenever the crown or the mass of individuals of different species could overlap with one another, and where the individual crowns could be outlined as a bidimensional polygon, for example, biphasic vegetation‐bare soil communities (alpine, subalpine and Arctic areas, sand dunes, drylands, salt pans, gypsum and other specialized soils), shrubland, vertically structured forest stands (see Figure for more details).…”