Modeling Forest Trees and Stands 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3170-9_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree Form and Stem Taper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the characterization of changes in the stem form or allocation of stem volume growth of a tree, the conventional ways have included either retrospective measurements from trees that were cut down, or modeling of the attributes of interest (e.g., Weiskittel et al 2011;Burkhart and Tomé et al 2012;Kershaw et al 2016). If a tree needs to be cut down for analysis, it will immediately mean the end of the monitoring period, which does not allow continuous time-series studies with several monitoring points.…”
Section: Methods For Detecting and Measuring Changes In Tree And Fore...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the characterization of changes in the stem form or allocation of stem volume growth of a tree, the conventional ways have included either retrospective measurements from trees that were cut down, or modeling of the attributes of interest (e.g., Weiskittel et al 2011;Burkhart and Tomé et al 2012;Kershaw et al 2016). If a tree needs to be cut down for analysis, it will immediately mean the end of the monitoring period, which does not allow continuous time-series studies with several monitoring points.…”
Section: Methods For Detecting and Measuring Changes In Tree And Fore...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1984). Mixed‐effects models allow autocorrelation to be at least partly accounted for by including random effects (Burkhart and Tomé 2012). The random effects are assumed to follow a multivariate normal distribution with a mean of zero and a positive‐definite variance‐covariance matrix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This violates the assumption of independence required to apply the nonlinear least squares method, resulting in unbiased parameter estimates but biased and inconsistent estimates of their variance (West et al 1984). Mixed-effects models allow autocorrelation to be at least partly accounted for by including random effects (Burkhart and Tomé 2012). The random effects are assumed to follow a multivariate normal distribution with a mean of zero and a positive-definite variancecovariance matrix.…”
Section: Prediction Of the Taper Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree merchantable stem volume was defined as the sum of the volume of all 1 m log segments up to the 9.1 cm stem top diameter. Stem taper was defined as the rate of decrease in stem diameter with increasing height from ground level to the tree tip (Burkhart and Tomé 2012).…”
Section: Tree Selection For Lumber Quality Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%