2012
DOI: 10.3390/s120912798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree Height Growth Measurement with Single-Scan Airborne, Static Terrestrial and Mobile Laser Scanning

Abstract: This study explores the feasibility of applying single-scan airborne, static terrestrial and mobile laser scanning for improving the accuracy of tree height growth measurement. Specifically, compared to the traditional works on forest growth inventory with airborne laser scanning, two issues are regarded: “Can the new technique characterize the height growth for each individual tree?” and “Can this technique refine the minimum growth-discernable temporal interval further?” To solve these two puzzles, the sampl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to such studies, tree height underestimation occurs because tree tops cannot be accurately determined in analogue aerial photographs of low spatial resolution and because terrain elevations (next to the tree) cannot be read because of dense crown canopies. The underestimation of tree heights also commonly occurs with other remote sensing methods, such as the most up-to-date LiDAR technology, whether it is the height estimation of individual trees (e.g., Falkowski et al 2006, Heurich 2008, Lin et al 2012, Hunter et al 2012 or of the mean stand heights (e.g., Naesset 2002b, Coops et al 2007, Hyyppä et al 2008. The underestimations of LiDAR-estimated individual tree heights reported by above-mentioned studies ranged from 0.43 to 1.20 m, whereas underestimations of LiDAR-estimated mean stand heights ranged up to 3.30 m. The magnitude of underestimation, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to such studies, tree height underestimation occurs because tree tops cannot be accurately determined in analogue aerial photographs of low spatial resolution and because terrain elevations (next to the tree) cannot be read because of dense crown canopies. The underestimation of tree heights also commonly occurs with other remote sensing methods, such as the most up-to-date LiDAR technology, whether it is the height estimation of individual trees (e.g., Falkowski et al 2006, Heurich 2008, Lin et al 2012, Hunter et al 2012 or of the mean stand heights (e.g., Naesset 2002b, Coops et al 2007, Hyyppä et al 2008. The underestimations of LiDAR-estimated individual tree heights reported by above-mentioned studies ranged from 0.43 to 1.20 m, whereas underestimations of LiDAR-estimated mean stand heights ranged up to 3.30 m. The magnitude of underestimation, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, and the resulting "-par max " can be merged into the final-step classification. This can expand the applications of the framework into various studies on forest ecology, meteorology and management, in which the strategy of combining aerospace/aerial imagery or LiDAR data with TLS reference data is often used (Hopkinson et al, 2004;Lin et al, 2012;Heinzel and Koch, 2012).…”
Section: Framework Applicabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the theme of stop-and-go measurement mode has been proposed and applied in a variety of domains, such as for solar energy accumulation in Mars Rover exploration [11] and for simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) in robot navigation [12]. Specifically for MLS, data collections in the stop-and-go mapping mode have been utilized as the reference data for, e.g., the calibration of the low-cost mobile mapping system [8] and the assessment of the mapping performance of different MLS systems [13]. Meantime, it is worth mentioning that the stop-and-go mode did not stem only from the process of improving MLS by incorporating the opposite strengths of TLS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%