2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.dendro.2012.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree-ring dating and radiocarbon wiggle matching of Buddhist arhat statues at Heungkuksa temple in Namyangju, South Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies show how the inclusion of only a few wiggle-matched dates in Bayesian sequences from Dating at Kitkahahki Pawnee Earthlodges 485 short-duration contexts can significantly improve the resolution of date models in calibration plateaus and reversals (Manning et al 2020). Wiggle-match dating has been used with increasing frequency to obtain independent calendar dates for ancient and historical structures (Nishimoto et al 2010;Hogg et al 2017;Marshall et al 2019), shipwrecks (Lorentzen et al 2014), artifacts (Park et al 2010;Kim et al 2013;Manning et al 2014;Fukuyo et al 2019), and to anchor floating tree-ring chronologies (Hogg et al 2002;Manning et al 2010;Pearson et al 2014;Kim et al 2015;Panyushkina et al 2017;Turkon et al 2018).…”
Section: C-based Cultural Chronologies On the Central Great Plainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies show how the inclusion of only a few wiggle-matched dates in Bayesian sequences from Dating at Kitkahahki Pawnee Earthlodges 485 short-duration contexts can significantly improve the resolution of date models in calibration plateaus and reversals (Manning et al 2020). Wiggle-match dating has been used with increasing frequency to obtain independent calendar dates for ancient and historical structures (Nishimoto et al 2010;Hogg et al 2017;Marshall et al 2019), shipwrecks (Lorentzen et al 2014), artifacts (Park et al 2010;Kim et al 2013;Manning et al 2014;Fukuyo et al 2019), and to anchor floating tree-ring chronologies (Hogg et al 2002;Manning et al 2010;Pearson et al 2014;Kim et al 2015;Panyushkina et al 2017;Turkon et al 2018).…”
Section: C-based Cultural Chronologies On the Central Great Plainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For pieces comprising timber, dendrochronology-the science of tree-ring dating-is a well-recognised source of both age and provenance data (Čufar 2007). Beyond enriching interpretation of a suite of wooden objects including panel paintings, statuary ( Haneca et al 2005a;Kim et al 2013) and musical instruments (Topham and McCormick 2000;Burckle and Grissino-Mayer 2003), dendrochronological data from investigations of artworks have also shed light upon aspects of historical trade (Bonde et al 1995;Wazny 2002) and human culture stretching to the Neolithic period ( Becker and Kromer 1986;Hillam et al 1990;Viellet 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…t-test or the coefficient of parallel synchronous variation ("Gleichläufigkeit", sensu (Eckstein, 1969)) at a specific position serves as an indicator of the cutting date and the geographical origin of the tree from which the timber originates (Bridge, 2012). This method has been successfully applied in many studies across Europe Haneca & Debonne, 2012;Domínguez-Delmás et al, 2014), as well as in other areas across the world (Hoshino et al, 2008;Kim et al, 2013). Nevertheless, this method has clear limitations, for instance, when strong teleconnections are found between tree-ring series originating from forests located hundreds of kilometres away from each other (e.g.…”
Section: Dendroarchaeology and Provenancingmentioning
confidence: 99%