2009
DOI: 10.1163/22941932-90000224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree-Ring Studies in India Past Appraisal, Present Status and Future Prospects

Abstract: A large number of tree species, especially of conifers growing in the Himalaya and a few broad-leaved taxa in the peninsular region, have been dendrochronologically analyzed in India. This paper is a review providing information as regards the present status and future prospects of tree-ring research in India. Many trees are recorded to have datable tree rings but only some of them have been used for climate reconstruction and other aspects, e.g., glacial fluctuation or palaeo-seismic dating. In future not onl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is increasing evidence suggesting that growth response of treeline trees to climate change and variability is spatiotemporally differentiated, species-specific, and not unidirectional. In general, tree-ring growth in the E Himalaya is less sensitive to climate variation compared to W Himalayan sites and trees (Bhattacharyya and Shah, 2009), and most studies reported radial growth of treeline conifers to be more responsive to temperature than precipitation change, with western and central Himalayan conifers being more responsive to winter and pre-monsoon temperatures and E Himalayan conifers often being more responsive to summer temperatures.…”
Section: Tree Physiognomy and Growth Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is increasing evidence suggesting that growth response of treeline trees to climate change and variability is spatiotemporally differentiated, species-specific, and not unidirectional. In general, tree-ring growth in the E Himalaya is less sensitive to climate variation compared to W Himalayan sites and trees (Bhattacharyya and Shah, 2009), and most studies reported radial growth of treeline conifers to be more responsive to temperature than precipitation change, with western and central Himalayan conifers being more responsive to winter and pre-monsoon temperatures and E Himalayan conifers often being more responsive to summer temperatures.…”
Section: Tree Physiognomy and Growth Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jacoby 1989, Fritts 1976, Priya & Bhat 1997, Pant 2003. Ring width is also considered a good anatomical indicator of age (Priya & Bhat 1998, Bhat et al 2001, and T. grandis is one of the tropical species that shows clear growth rings and suitable for climatic analysis (Chowdhury 1964, Détienne 1989, Bhattacharyya & Shah 2009.…”
Section: Growth Rate and Ring Width Variability Of Teak Tectona Granmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with subalpine forests, little is known about the growth response of subtropical and tropical forests to climate change in the central Himalayas. Several studies in the Himalayas revealed that subtropical and tropical tree species showed dendrochronological potentials [17][18][19] As a dominant tree (with total stem volume 11.62 m 3 /ha and total biomass 9.9 t/ha) across the Himalayan subtropical zone [20], Chir pine (Pinus roxburghii) is a representative species for investigating impacts of climate change in recent decades on the subtropical forest ecosystem. However, its dendrochronological potential has not yet been fully explored [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%