2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10342-018-1140-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree species could have substantial consequences on topsoil fauna: a feedback of land degradation/restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tropical secondary forests are environments with a richness of species and micro-habitats that can be used by a variety of organisms. When these forests are replaced by monocultures, there is a simplification of the environment that reflects throughout the biota, including in the edaphic fauna community (Baretta et al, 2011;Frevolente et al, 2012;Garlet et al, 2013;Chang et al, 2017;Laird-Hopkins et al, 2017;Kooch et al, 2018). This is what happened to the non-girdled eucalyptus areas with lower values for abundance, richness and diversity when compared to the other areas analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tropical secondary forests are environments with a richness of species and micro-habitats that can be used by a variety of organisms. When these forests are replaced by monocultures, there is a simplification of the environment that reflects throughout the biota, including in the edaphic fauna community (Baretta et al, 2011;Frevolente et al, 2012;Garlet et al, 2013;Chang et al, 2017;Laird-Hopkins et al, 2017;Kooch et al, 2018). This is what happened to the non-girdled eucalyptus areas with lower values for abundance, richness and diversity when compared to the other areas analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Changes in land use and forest fragmentation have been one of the changing factors in the structure and composition of the soil macrofauna community (Baretta et al, 2011;Maestri et al, 2013;Camara et al, 2018;Silva et al, 2018;Nunes et al, 2019). Studies have verified that this effect also occurs when native forests are replaced by monocultures, even though forest (Suguituru et al, 2011;Camara et al, 2012;Silva et al, 2012;Marques et al, 2014;Tacca et al, 2017;Rodrigues et al, 2017;Kooch et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earthworm density and biomass of were significantly different between skid trails and undisturbed area, but there was no difference in ecological diversity. According to the observations obtained from earthworm sampling, their appearance and general characteristics, and previous studies in the Hyrcanian forests of Iran [69], the type or species of epigeic earthworms is more than two types of anecic and endogeic earthworms. In all of the skid trails as well as the undisturbed area, density and dry mass of epigeic earthworms were higher than the corresponding values for anecic and endogeic earthworms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Numerous biotic and abiotic indicators of the transition towards ecosystem restoration have been proposed (Gann et al, 2019). Soil faunal communities (Frouz et al, 2009; Kooch, Tavakoli, & Akbarinia, 2018) and microbial indices (e.g., Hu et al, 2016; Ros, Hernandez, & Carlos, 2003) have provided useful descriptors of the restoration trajectory, with improved biomolecular methodologies enabling a contemporary focus on soil microbial assemblages and associated functional groupings (Banning et al, 2011; Harris, 2009; Strickland et al, 2017). Soil development is also facilitated through processes driven by vegetation and soil biota (Brady & Weil, 2008; Kelly, Chadwick, & Hilinski, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%