2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2005.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree species (Picea abies and Fagus sylvatica) effects on soil water acidification and aluminium chemistry at sites subjected to long-term acidification in the Ore Mts., Czech Republic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
49
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, beech stemflow accounted for roughly 10% of total N input to the forest floor by precipitation. Despite similar current N throughfall fluxes, estimated historical N deposition to the spruce forest was higher compared with the beech stand [32], suggesting higher cumulative N deposition flux in the spruce plantation compared to the beech forest. Litterfall N flux was higher in the beech stand compared to the spruce stand; however, a lower C/N litterfall ratio was measured in the spruce litter (42) compared to beech litter (52).…”
Section: Tree Species Effects On N Cyclingmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On average, beech stemflow accounted for roughly 10% of total N input to the forest floor by precipitation. Despite similar current N throughfall fluxes, estimated historical N deposition to the spruce forest was higher compared with the beech stand [32], suggesting higher cumulative N deposition flux in the spruce plantation compared to the beech forest. Litterfall N flux was higher in the beech stand compared to the spruce stand; however, a lower C/N litterfall ratio was measured in the spruce litter (42) compared to beech litter (52).…”
Section: Tree Species Effects On N Cyclingmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Soils at both sites were acidified by acid deposition during the 20th century, which resulted in low soil pH and low base saturation. More substantial soil acidification was documented in the spruce stand due to the higher acid deposition under the spruce canopy compared to the beech stand [32]. In 2003, the pH of the forest floor was 3.80 in the spruce stand and 4.34 in the beech stand, and soil base saturation was 19% and 70% in the spruce and beech stands, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Stemflow generated between condominant tree species may be highly affected by wind and the spatial variability of throughfall was also documented (Bouten et al, 1992;Keim et al, 2005;Holko, 2010Holko, , 2011. Concentrations of dissolved substances in throughfall and stemflow may be considerably different (Kantor, 1985;Raubuch et al, 1998;Oulehle and Hruška, 2005;Devlaeminck et al, 2005;. It was shown that the spatially distributed infiltration under the forest canopy caused a significantly variable water regime (Bouten et al, 1992;Raat et al, 2002;Liang et al, 2007Liang et al, , 2009Guswa and Spence, 2012;Guswa et al, 2012) and soil solution chemistry (Chang and Matzner, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ ) and enhanced leaching of Al from soil may contribute to forest dieback [3,6,7]. Furthermore, dry deposition of acidic substances onto the canopy of coniferous spruce trees substantially increases acid inputs to the soil in comparison to the canopy of decidous beech [8]. Another important factor controlling the effects of acidic deposition on water quality is the bedrock type [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%