2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2011.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree survey and allometric models for tiger bush in northern Senegal and comparison with tree parameters derived from high resolution satellite data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
29
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results were verified in a quality assessment and agree well with the Tree Crown Cover (TCC) fraction determined in a previous survey in the validation area [55], where a TCC between 3% and 4.5% was found by manually classifying five sample regions. Due to the small TCC value, the effect of varying TCC between 3% and 6% on retrieved LST is negligible [18].…”
Section: Estimation Of Land Surface Cover and Representative In-situ supporting
confidence: 85%
“…The results were verified in a quality assessment and agree well with the Tree Crown Cover (TCC) fraction determined in a previous survey in the validation area [55], where a TCC between 3% and 4.5% was found by manually classifying five sample regions. Due to the small TCC value, the effect of varying TCC between 3% and 6% on retrieved LST is negligible [18].…”
Section: Estimation Of Land Surface Cover and Representative In-situ supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Herrmann, Wickhorst, & Marsh, 2013;Karlson, Reese, & Ostwald, 2014;Rasmussen et al, 2011;Sterling & Orr, 2014;San Emeterio & Mering, 2012). However, imageries with a spatial resolution of 1-5 m are cumbersome to process, expensive, susceptible to clouds, and do only provide a static situation for a limited spatial area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are similar or better when compared to related research where high resolution satellite data and GEOBIA has been used for mapping TCC (Rasmussen et al 2011, Morales, Miura, andIdol 2008). For example, Rasmussen et al (2011) reported a moderate agreement (R 2 = 0.51) between field data and TCC derived from Quickbird data for an area in northern Senegal. Morales et al (2008) reported R 2 = 0.86 and MAE = 2% when using Ikonos data in a Hawaiian dry forest.…”
Section: Level Of Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 95%