2006
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TreeDyn: towards dynamic graphics and annotations for analyses of trees

Abstract: Background: Analyses of biomolecules for biodiversity, phylogeny or structure/function studies often use graphical tree representations. Many powerful tree editors are now available, but existing tree visualization tools make little use of meta-information related to the entities under study such as taxonomic descriptions or gene functions that can hardly be encoded within the tree itself (if using popular tree formats). Consequently, a tedious manual analysis and post-processing of the tree graphics are requi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
610
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 956 publications
(639 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
610
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The reliability for the internal branches was assessed using the approximate likelihood ratio test (aLRT -SHLike) (Anisimova and Gascuel, 2006). Graphical representation and editing of the phylogenetic trees were performed with TreeDyn (v 198.3) (Chevenet et al, 2006). …”
Section: Dna Isolation and Phylogenetic Analysis Of A Phagocytophilumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability for the internal branches was assessed using the approximate likelihood ratio test (aLRT -SHLike) (Anisimova and Gascuel, 2006). Graphical representation and editing of the phylogenetic trees were performed with TreeDyn (v 198.3) (Chevenet et al, 2006). …”
Section: Dna Isolation and Phylogenetic Analysis Of A Phagocytophilumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phylogeny was determined with PhyML using the GTR substitution model with 100 bootstraps (Anisimova & Gascuel, 2006;Guindon & Gascuel, 2003). The resultant phylogenetic tree was generated with TreeDyn (Chevenet et al, 2006). These tools were accessed through phylogeny.fr (Dereeper et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the neighbour-joining analysis, a distance matrix was calculated using Kimura's two-parameter correction and bootstraps were performed using 1000 replications. Phylogenetic trees were drawn using TreeDyn (Chevenet et al, 2006) or SeaView. A consensus phylogenetic tree is shown in Supplementary Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%