2010
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TreeGraph 2: Combining and visualizing evidence from different phylogenetic analyses

Abstract: BackgroundToday it is common to apply multiple potentially conflicting data sources to a given phylogenetic problem. At the same time, several different inference techniques are routinely employed instead of relying on just one. In view of both trends it is becoming increasingly important to be able to efficiently compare different sets of statistical values supporting (or conflicting with) the nodes of a given tree topology, and merging this into a meaningful representation. A tree editor supporting this shou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
836
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,352 publications
(843 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
836
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Maximum-likelihood trees, with approximate likelihood ratio test for internal nodes support, were inferred using PhyML (Guindon & Gascuel, 2003). Phylogenetic trees were visualized and edited with TreeGraph2 (Stöver & Müller, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum-likelihood trees, with approximate likelihood ratio test for internal nodes support, were inferred using PhyML (Guindon & Gascuel, 2003). Phylogenetic trees were visualized and edited with TreeGraph2 (Stöver & Müller, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One thousand jackknife pseudoreplicates were performed using the same search strategy, albeit with only 100 RAS þ TBR þ ratchet searches per pseudoreplicate. Jackknife values were mapped onto the strict consensus trees using SUMTREES v. 3.3.1 [57], after which the trees were examined and printed using TREEGRAPH v. 2.0.54-364 [58].…”
Section: (C) Phylogenetic Analyses (I) Parsimonymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cluster analysis was performed according to UPGMA (Unweighted Pair-Group Method with Arithmetical Averages) algorithm and a dendrogram by using Populations 1.2.31 was generated and visualized with TreeGraph 2.0 (Stöver and Müller 2010).…”
Section: Dna Extraction and Microsatellites Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%