1999
DOI: 10.1112/s0024611599001768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trees in Renorming Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Formalizing a definition which appears implicitly in [6,7], we shall say that a mapping T : C(K) → c 0 (K × Γ) is a (non-linear) Talagrand operator of class C m if…”
Section: Typeset By a M S-t E Xmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Formalizing a definition which appears implicitly in [6,7], we shall say that a mapping T : C(K) → c 0 (K × Γ) is a (non-linear) Talagrand operator of class C m if…”
Section: Typeset By a M S-t E Xmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis in that paper of compact spaces constructed using trees suggested that for a compact space K the existence of an equivalent norm on C(K) which is of class C 1 (except at 0 of course) might imply the existence of such a norm which is of class C ∞ . Certainly, this is what happens with norms constructed using linear Talagrand operators as in [5,6,7]. The other important (and older) method of obtaining C 1 norms is to construct a norm with locally uniformly rotund dual norm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is natural therefore to hope for good results when we look at these compact spaces in the context of renorming theory. In fact, however, as Todorcevic [15] has recently observed, there is a scattered Rosenthal compactification K of a tree space such that C(K) has no LUR renorming, [6]. Now that space K is non-separable and, as other recent work of Todorcevic [16] has shown, it is only from separable Rosenthal compacta that we should expect really good behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As in [6] and [7], this follows from Banach's Contraction Mapping Theorem applied in a suitable function space. To describe it we take as domain for our functions the set…”
Section: Lemma 2 ([4] P279)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation