2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40104-6_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treewidth and Pathwidth Parameterized by the Vertex Cover Number

Abstract: International audienceAfter the number of vertices, Vertex Cover Number is the largest of the classical graph parameters and has more and more frequently been used as a separate parameter in parameterized problems, including problems that are not directly related to the Vertex Cover Number. Here we consider the treewidth and pathwidth problems parameterized by k, the size of a minimum vertex cover of the input graph. We show that the pathwidth and treewidth can be computed in O *(3 k ) time. This complements r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kernels for VC and WVC were given in [10,14,25], and results relating to the parameterized approximability of VC were also examined in the literature (see, e.g., [5,6,20]). Finally, in the context of Parameterized Complexity, we would also like to note that vc is a parameter of interest; indeed, apart from VC, there are other problems whose parameterized complexity was studied with respect to this parameter (see, e.g., [9,23,26]).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kernels for VC and WVC were given in [10,14,25], and results relating to the parameterized approximability of VC were also examined in the literature (see, e.g., [5,6,20]). Finally, in the context of Parameterized Complexity, we would also like to note that vc is a parameter of interest; indeed, apart from VC, there are other problems whose parameterized complexity was studied with respect to this parameter (see, e.g., [9,23,26]).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pipelined with our main combinatorial result, we deduce that all these problems can be solved in time O * (4 vc ) or O * (1.7347 mw ). Recently Chapelle et al [6] provided an algorithm solving Treewidth and Pathwidth in O * (3 vc ), but those completely different techniques do not seem to work for Minimum Fill-in or Treelength. The interested reader may also refer., e.g., to [10,11] for more (layout) problems parameterized by vertex cover.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%