2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvlc.2012.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treewidth, pathwidth and cospan decompositions with applications to graph-accepting tree automata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[13,6,4]). The originality of our approach consists in restricting to the category of unambiguous graphs and connecting morphisms that allow the resulting semigroup to be an inverse semigroup.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[13,6,4]). The originality of our approach consists in restricting to the category of unambiguous graphs and connecting morphisms that allow the resulting semigroup to be an inverse semigroup.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In category theoretical term, a birooted graph is a cospan (see for instance [4]). The existence of pushouts in the category UCGrph(A) allows us to define the product of birooted graphs as the product of their cospan.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By virtue of this algebraic structure we introduced a syntactic recognizability notion for sets of fuzzy graphs employing the syntactic magmoid in a role analogous to the syntactic monoid of string languages. This approach shall allow us to explore the fuzzy case for existing crisp graph theoretic methods and techniques involving formal verification [3,4,13] and natural language processing [31] as well as for the syntactic complexity of string and graph languages [14,15,22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to any such fixed representation, learners for strings or trees can be also seen as learners for other structures. For instance, representations of graphs and multigraphs by trees or strings are described in [29,79].…”
Section: Beyond Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%