2021
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.740084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trend and Impact of Concomitant CABG and Multiple-Valve Procedure on In-hospital Outcomes of SAVR Patients

Abstract: Background: The trends of concomitant CABG and multiple-valve procedures and their impact on in-hospital outcomes in the context of transcatheter aortic valve replacement are unexplored.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using the administrative database of the U.S. national inpatient sample from 2012 to 2018 to identify patients who underwent SAVR with or without concomitant CABG and/or multiple-valve procedures.Results: During the study period, a total of 75,763 representing 378,815 patients unde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this is different when we consider the second day for CABG and valve replacement procedures. Recently Wu et al 35 , demonstrated that a combination of CABG and valve replacement was associated with worse in-hospital outcomes, including high in-hospital mortality and increased costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is different when we consider the second day for CABG and valve replacement procedures. Recently Wu et al 35 , demonstrated that a combination of CABG and valve replacement was associated with worse in-hospital outcomes, including high in-hospital mortality and increased costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we queried the NIS database from inception of the ICD-10-CM coding system to the latest available time (from October 2015 through 2019). STEMI hospitalizations were identified using the ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes I21.0x, I21.1x, I21.2x, and I21.3 ( Supplementary Table 1 ), which have been previously validated ( 22 , 23 ). We excluded records of patients who did not undergo PCI; with missing information on the number of treated vessels in procedure codes; with age at admission <18 years; and with missing data on in-hospital mortality ( Supplementary Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STEMI hospitalizations were identified using the ICD‐10‐CM diagnosis codes I21.0x, I21.1x, I21.2x, and I21.3; NSTEMI hospitalizations were identified using the ICD‐10‐CM diagnosis code I21.3; and ET and PV were identified using the ICD‐10‐CM diagnosis codes D47.3 and D45 15 , 16 , 17 (Table S1 ). All STEMI hospitalizations were included in this study, and only NSTEMI diagnoses coded as the primary diagnosis were included to reduce the heterogeneity of the population with NSTEMI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%