2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trend definition or holding strategy: What determines the profitability of candlestick charting?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This article analyzes both MYR and CL exit strategies to evaluate the impacts of exit strategies on profitability of candlestick patterns. In fact, Lu et al (2015) apply candlestick trading strategies to the 30 component stocks of the DJIA index over the 1992-2012 period and find that candlestick patterns with the CL exit strategy, but not with the MYR exit strategy, are profitable. They argue that the profitability of the CL exit strategy comes from a risk sharing mechanism when positions are unwound over the holding periods.…”
Section: Candlestick Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This article analyzes both MYR and CL exit strategies to evaluate the impacts of exit strategies on profitability of candlestick patterns. In fact, Lu et al (2015) apply candlestick trading strategies to the 30 component stocks of the DJIA index over the 1992-2012 period and find that candlestick patterns with the CL exit strategy, but not with the MYR exit strategy, are profitable. They argue that the profitability of the CL exit strategy comes from a risk sharing mechanism when positions are unwound over the holding periods.…”
Section: Candlestick Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other studies find that applying certain candlestick patterns is profitable at least for short-term trading (Goo, Chen, & Chang, 2007;Lu, Shiu, & Liu, 2012;Shiu & Lu, 2011;Zhu, Atri, & Yegen, 2016), at least in the Taiwanese and Chinese stock markets. Interestingly, Lu, Chen, and Hsu (2015) even find significant positive returns in the U.S. stock markets if investors follow the Caginalp-Laurent (CL) exit strategies (Caginalp & Laurent, 1998) but not the Marshall-Young-Rose (MYR) exit strategies (Marshall et al, 2006). The MYR applies a prespecified date to exit the market, whereas the CL sets an exit price equal to an average holding period closing price.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the positive side, Xie et al (2012) [6] find that candlestick patterns have significant predictive power to forecast US equity returns. Lu et al (2015) [7] find predictive power in several patterns, but these are rare and the research in addition did not sufficiently address the distinction between candlestick patterns being able to yield profit and their being able to predict trends. One study, that of Lu (2014) [8], finds that traditional patterns have little value but that novel ones may do so; this finding is in line with observations made in the current work, though it should again be emphasised that our use of the mid-price as target creates a very different context.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, Caginalp and Laurent performed a statistical test including eight kinds of three-day patterns and noted that the candlestick patterns have predictive power [10]. Then Lu et al examined these eight three-day patterns with three definitions of trend and four holding strategies in the DJIA component data, and found that regardless of which definition of the trend was used, eight three-day reversal patterns with a Caginalp-Laurent holding strategy were profitable [11]. Chen et al gave the quantitative definitions of four pairs of two-day candlestick patterns to study their predictive power in Chinese stock market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%