ATM 2020
DOI: 10.20937/atm.52757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trend estimation and forecasting of atmospheric pollutants in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area through a non-parametric perspective

Abstract: Trends and forecasts of the main atmospheric pollutants (O3, SO2, NO2, CO, PM10, PM2.5, NO and NOX) are estimated by regions of the Metropolitan Zone of Mexico City (MZMC), with maximum daily data from 2008 to 2018. A nonparametric statistical smoothing controlled technique based on the Hodrick and Prescott filter and estimated through the Kalman filter, is used. Both point and interval estimates, as well as their respective forecasts are generated. The estimates against the Environmental Standard for Mexico C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Except for simple situations, such as a turnaround or a leveling off of the trend, it is generally difficult to interpret highly nonlinear behavior through an explicit parametric representation or a deterministic model (Chandler and Scott, 2011). Many adaptive nonlinear trend fitting techniques are available, such as state-space modeling (and its variant, dynamical linear modeling; Petris et al, 2009;Durbin and Koopman, 2012;Laine et al, 2014), vector autoregressive modeling (Holt and Tera ¨svirta, 2020), empirical mode decomposition (Wu et al, 2007), signal filter technique (Thoning et al, 1989), the Gasser-Mu ¨ller kernel smoothing (Gasser and Mu ¨ller, 1984), the Kalman filter (Harvey, 1990;Ramos-Ibarra and Silva, 2020), and the Kolmogorov-Zurbenko filter (Rao et al, 1997;Yang and Zurbenko, 2010). It should be emphasized that even though the above techniques are able to capture the nonlinearity in the time series, not all the curve features can be considered to be a change point of the trends or having interpretable information (see Figure 9).…”
Section: Discussion Of Further Advanced Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for simple situations, such as a turnaround or a leveling off of the trend, it is generally difficult to interpret highly nonlinear behavior through an explicit parametric representation or a deterministic model (Chandler and Scott, 2011). Many adaptive nonlinear trend fitting techniques are available, such as state-space modeling (and its variant, dynamical linear modeling; Petris et al, 2009;Durbin and Koopman, 2012;Laine et al, 2014), vector autoregressive modeling (Holt and Tera ¨svirta, 2020), empirical mode decomposition (Wu et al, 2007), signal filter technique (Thoning et al, 1989), the Gasser-Mu ¨ller kernel smoothing (Gasser and Mu ¨ller, 1984), the Kalman filter (Harvey, 1990;Ramos-Ibarra and Silva, 2020), and the Kolmogorov-Zurbenko filter (Rao et al, 1997;Yang and Zurbenko, 2010). It should be emphasized that even though the above techniques are able to capture the nonlinearity in the time series, not all the curve features can be considered to be a change point of the trends or having interpretable information (see Figure 9).…”
Section: Discussion Of Further Advanced Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%