2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends and Challenges in Measuring Performance of Reviewer Paper Assignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The used evaluation measures are also quite distinct and numerous. This finding is consistent with the one made by Patil and Mahalle [33] in their review of performance measures used for the evaluation of RAP solutions. In addition to several traditional information retrieval evaluation measures, the selected studies used a myriad of custom defined evaluation measures, many of which were used in one study only.…”
Section: Summary Of Evidencesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The used evaluation measures are also quite distinct and numerous. This finding is consistent with the one made by Patil and Mahalle [33] in their review of performance measures used for the evaluation of RAP solutions. In addition to several traditional information retrieval evaluation measures, the selected studies used a myriad of custom defined evaluation measures, many of which were used in one study only.…”
Section: Summary Of Evidencesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In [12], The Reviewer Assignment Problem (RAP) is presented. This is one of the most important and apparent processes that involves the process of assigning a reviewer to a paper.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the assignment problem is formulated as given in Section 4. The variants of the assignment problems presented in sources [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] are obtained by modifying the constraints and objective function of Table 1.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The publication of a scientific article often needs to undergo multiple steps, among which peer review plays an essential role. [1] Appropriate reviewers can offer valuable suggestions to authors for manuscript revision and assist editors in decision-making, thereby helping to improve the quality of the paper and facilitate the peer review process. [2] Despite editors being able to rely on their reviewer database and authors' recommendations to choose reviewers, finding an adequate number of qualified reviewers who are experienced in the research area of the submitted manuscripts is still tough, given the rapid growth of submissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%