2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends and perspectives on the use of animal social network analysis in behavioural ecology: a bibliometric approach

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
106
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
106
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Social structure, defined as the patterning of repeated interactions between individuals (Hinde 49 1976), represents a fundamental characteristic of many animal populations with far-reaching 50 consequences for ecology and evolution, including for gene-flow, social evolution, pathogen 51 transmission, and the emergence of culture (Kurvers et al, 2014). The last two decades have seen 52 widespread adoption of social network methods in animal behaviour research to quantify social 53 structure (Webber & vander Wal, 2019). The network framework is appealing because it explicitly 54 represents the relationships between social entities from which social structure emerges (Hinde, 55 1976), and thus allows tests of hypotheses about social structure at a variety of scales (individual, 56 dyadic, group, population).…”
Section: Introduction 48mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social structure, defined as the patterning of repeated interactions between individuals (Hinde 49 1976), represents a fundamental characteristic of many animal populations with far-reaching 50 consequences for ecology and evolution, including for gene-flow, social evolution, pathogen 51 transmission, and the emergence of culture (Kurvers et al, 2014). The last two decades have seen 52 widespread adoption of social network methods in animal behaviour research to quantify social 53 structure (Webber & vander Wal, 2019). The network framework is appealing because it explicitly 54 represents the relationships between social entities from which social structure emerges (Hinde, 55 1976), and thus allows tests of hypotheses about social structure at a variety of scales (individual, 56 dyadic, group, population).…”
Section: Introduction 48mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, data collected using passive‐integrated transponders (e.g. Aplin et al, ) is increasingly being used to generate animal social networks (Webber & Vander Wal, ) and spatsoc could represent a novel and computationally efficient way to generate social networks for large PIT‐tag datasets. The basic principles of spatsoc and grouping functions can be applied to other data types, including PIT‐tags, as long as both spatial and temporal information are known.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include dynamic interaction networks (Long, Nelson, Webb, & Gee, 2014), PBSNs (Spiegel, Sih, Leu, & Bull, 2017) and the development of traditional randomization techniques to assess non-random structure of PBSNs constructed using animal telemetry data (Spiegel et al, 2016). Despite the recent increase in the number of studies using animal telemetry data and GPS relocation data (Webber & Vander Wal, 2019), there is no comprehensive r package that generates PBSNs using animal telemetry data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By evaluating every interaction between pairs of individuals in a group, network analysis can be used to represent integrated systems such as social groups, providing insights into the formation, dynamics, and function of group structure 24,[32][33][34] . This type of analysis can be employed to investigate transmission processes in groups as a basis for understanding complex phenomena such as microbe transmission, social grooming, decision making, and hierarchy 3,32,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] . Although analysis of individual behaviors and social networks highlight different aspects of social interaction, they are complementary for understanding complex emergent phenomena such as group behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%