2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.07.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends and predictors of survival for small cell carcinoma of the cervix uteri: A SEER population study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The median survival time for all included patients in the present study was approximately 24 months, with an estimated 5-year OS rate of 31.4%, comparable to a previous SEER study, 12 but shorter than a previous systematic review reporting a median OS time of 40 months. 1 The discrepancy may be explained by the fact that the latter study included 7.6% of other NECC histological subtypes, which had a better prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The median survival time for all included patients in the present study was approximately 24 months, with an estimated 5-year OS rate of 31.4%, comparable to a previous SEER study, 12 but shorter than a previous systematic review reporting a median OS time of 40 months. 1 The discrepancy may be explained by the fact that the latter study included 7.6% of other NECC histological subtypes, which had a better prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The non-linear correlation between age at diagnosis and all CODs was investigated by means of a restricted cubic spline (RCS) 18 , 19 . Methods for multivariate and univariate analysis by Cox regression model were described in our previous studies 20 , 21 . In addition, considering that stage Ia HCC patients could enjoy long-term survival, we further regarded HCC-NDSD as a competing event in this cohort.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, for mCC patients diagnosed in 2016, the variable "metastatic sites" was reclassified based on the criteria of "Metastasis at diagnosis-Distant LN (2016+)" and "Metastasis at diagnosis-Other (2016+)." The variables "Age at diagnosis, " "Insurance status, " "Race, " "Marital status, " "Tumor histology, " "Differentiation, " "T stage, " "N stage, " "Surgery at the primary site, " "delivery of RT, " and "use of CT" were as described previously (14,15). Following our previous study, we set 65 years old as the cutoff point for the age at diagnosis in the current study.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%