Trends in Advanced Computed Tomography Use for Injured Patients in United States Emergency Departments: 2007–2010

Abstract

Objectives: Studies have documented increased advanced radiography use in U.S. emergency departments (EDs) for injured patients over the past decade. The authors explored trends in recent years (2007 through 2010) in advanced radiography use, specifically head computed tomography (CT) and nonhead CT scans.Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of ED visits conducted using data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), a representative sample of the U.S. ED visits from 2007 through 2010. All patients designated by the NHAMCS as "related to injury" were included in analyses. CT use was examined by head and nonhead use. Trends, predictors of utilization, and diagnostic yield for head and nonhead CT scans in injured ED patients were analyzed using survey-weighted logistic regression. Diagnostic yield was defined as the proportion of injury-related visits where patients imaged with CT received International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9), code diagnoses of a severe head or nonhead injury.Results: Among injured ED patients, head CT use increased from 9.6% in 2007 to 11.6%, a relative increase of 20.8% (p < 0.001), and nonhead CT from 5.5% to 7.3%, a relative increase of 47.3% (p < 0.001). Diagnostic yield for head CT was unchanged (4.9% in 2007 vs. 3.4% in 2010, p = 0.093), but fell for nonhead CT from 6.4% in 2007 to 3.3% in 2010 (p = 0.04. Conclusions:Advanced radiography use has continued to increase since 2007 in injured patients, and diagnostic yield for nonhead CT has continued to fall. Head CT is more common than CTs of other body areas and may represent an opportunity for reduction given validated clinical decision rules.ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2015;22:663-669

Evaluation of the Head Multislice Computed Tomography Scan in Emergency Department

“…CT is also valuable as a tool to select patients who require immediate surgical treatment versus those who require in-hospital observation and medical management. Th ere is an increase in the use of CT for injured patients 6 . Head CT related to trauma is also more common than CT of other body areas 6 .…”

“…Th ere is an increase in the use of CT for injured patients 6 . Head CT related to trauma is also more common than CT of other body areas 6 . More than 1.7 million traumatic brain injuries (TBI) occur in the United States each year and an increase in the number and rate of head trauma has been noted in the last decade 7,8 .…”

Prevalence of Chest Injury With the Presence of NEXUS Chest Criteria: Data to Inform Shared Decisionmaking About Imaging Use

“…1 This increase in imaging has not been accompanied by a proportional increase in the diagnosis of lifethreatening conditions, 1 but has led to longer ED stays, higher costs, and increased ionizing radiation exposure. [2][3][4][5][6] Patient preference for CT imaging varies and depends on the potential for serious injury. 7 However, these potential risks are either poorly quantified or completely unknown, limiting the extent to which outcome data can inform patient and physician shared decisionmaking about imaging.…”

Policy Measures and Reimbursement for Emergency Medical Imaging in the Era of Payment Reform: Proceedings From a Panel Discussion of the 2015 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference

“…While imaging is an integral part of high-quality emergency care, evidence demonstrates wide institution- and provider-level variation in utilization of certain studies without measurable differences in patient-centered outcomes. 22,23 The aim of CEDR is to measure imaging use to develop standard benchmark utilization rates and then compare practice among different institutions and providers, thereby allowing EDs to better identify particular studies that may be targets for decreasing utilization. At this time, safe utilization reduction practice using benchmarked imaging rates is primarily theoretical.…”