2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.01.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in care processes and survival following prehospital resuscitation improvement initiatives for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in British Columbia, 2006–2016

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of survival to hospital discharge among all Beijing EMS-treated OHCA cases was continuously less than 2%, and it remains poor when compared with that of other countries in recent years, including the USA (9.6%), Korea (8.5%) and England (7.9%). [5][6][7][8][9][10] Improving the early links in the cardiac arrest chain of survival, including early recognition and calling the EMS, bystander CPR and the use of public access defibrillation (PAD) can improve outcomes. 18 We found that the distributions of the sex and age of patients with OHCA enrolled in the current study and the ratio of witnessed cardiac arrest were stable during the study years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of survival to hospital discharge among all Beijing EMS-treated OHCA cases was continuously less than 2%, and it remains poor when compared with that of other countries in recent years, including the USA (9.6%), Korea (8.5%) and England (7.9%). [5][6][7][8][9][10] Improving the early links in the cardiac arrest chain of survival, including early recognition and calling the EMS, bystander CPR and the use of public access defibrillation (PAD) can improve outcomes. 18 We found that the distributions of the sex and age of patients with OHCA enrolled in the current study and the ratio of witnessed cardiac arrest were stable during the study years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, efforts have been made to increase the bystander CPR rate in most countries, especially in developed countries [ 8 ]. Along with the increased bystander CPR rate, OHCA survival rates have been increasing in some developed counties [ 9 11 ]. For instance, the bystander CPR rates and OHCA survival rates increased as follows: from 39.4% in 2006–2009 to 48.9% in 2014–2016, and from 10.4 to 14.9% in the same period of time in Canada [ 9 ]; from 28.2% in 2005 to 36.3% in 2012, and from 5.7 to 9.8% in the same period of time in the United States [ 11 ]; from 65.8% in 2006 to 81.2% in 2012, and from 16.2 to 19.7% in the same period of time in the Netherlands [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence has shown that the OHCA survival rate is closely associated with many pre-hospital modifiable factors besides bystander CPR [ 6 , 9 , 14 , 15 ], including initial shockable rhythm, early defibrillation, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and survived event (defined as ROSC sustained until the arrival at the emergency department and transfer of care to medical staff at the receiving hospital) [ 6 , 9 , 14 , 15 ]. Most studies focused on exploring the relationship between prehospital factors and the survival rate after OHCA using multivariate logistic regression analysis [ 16 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among these studies, different interventions for system performance improvement were implemented in different contexts (IHCA versus OHCA); the heterogeneity of the studies precludes any meta-analysis. Thirteen of these studies 92À97, 99,100,102,103,105,106,108 showed an association of significantly higher chance of survival with favorable neurological outcome at discharge with implementation of interventions for system performance improvement. The other 6 studies, 91,98,101,104,107,109 including 1 cluster-randomized trial, 91 showed no significant improvement after interventions were implemented.…”
Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%