2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-004-2503-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in chemometric analysis of comprehensive two-dimensional separations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemometric calibration techniques have also been applied to GC × GC, such as principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares (PLS), and multilinear partial least squares (NPLS) [48,[63][64][65]. Chemometrics in 2D separations have been reviewed [66,67].…”
Section: Quantitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemometric calibration techniques have also been applied to GC × GC, such as principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares (PLS), and multilinear partial least squares (NPLS) [48,[63][64][65]. Chemometrics in 2D separations have been reviewed [66,67].…”
Section: Quantitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although GC/MS provides high sensitivity for analysis, separation often is not ideally achieved in more complex mixtures. Multi-dimensional chromatography methods used in tandem with mass spectrometry, in particular comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with time-of-flight-mass-spectrometry analysis (GC × GC-TOFMS), have been developed to address this issue [2230]. When coupled to computational deconvolution analysis this technique becomes a powerful tool for identifying and quantifying trace analytes in complex mixtures [336].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the second-order advantage is not achieved by both U-PLS and N-PLS, so the composition of the calibration sample set must be carefully designed in order to guarantee that all possible interferences of the prediction sample set (unknown samples) must be present in the calibration step [12,24]. Furthermore, these algorithms do not require peak identification while taking advantage of the redundant measurements of each analyte peak with GC Â GC separation.…”
Section: Multiway Calibration Ii: Direct Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%