<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Medicine and the field of neurology are not immune to gender and racial disparities present more broadly in society. Even within academia there remains a persistent lack of representation of women and racial minorities, but with the recent spotlight on discrimination it is more necessary than ever that prevailing disparities are acknowledged by medical journals and reflected in their publication priorities. This bibliometric study assesses whether social justice trends have influenced the number of articles published that discuss gender and racial disparity in the past 5 years within the top three leading neurological journals. Our assumption is that any trend towards more publications related to gender and racial disparities are reflective of the publication priorities of, and thus the perceived relevance to, the editorial boards of the chosen journals. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Using key word search of “gender,” “race,” and “disparity” in the title or context of published papers, the archives of <i>Lancet Neurology</i>, <i>Nature Reviews Neurology</i>, and <i>Alzheimer’s & Dementia</i> were reviewed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The results indicated that although there was a slight overall increase in coverage of the aforementioned topics, it was negligible compared to the broad impact of current social justice movements. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our data suggest an inadequate publication priority for scholarly work on gender and racial disparity in the chosen journals, over the latest 5 years reviewed.