2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00336-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in floods and low flows in the United States: impact of spatial correlation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
699
5
15

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 985 publications
(735 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
16
699
5
15
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) (after Hirsch and Slack, 1984). For cases the sample size n is larger than 10, the standard normal variate p is computed by using the following equation (see Douglas et al, 2000)…”
Section: Trends In Rainfall and Stream Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) (after Hirsch and Slack, 1984). For cases the sample size n is larger than 10, the standard normal variate p is computed by using the following equation (see Douglas et al, 2000)…”
Section: Trends In Rainfall and Stream Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include work in the US (Lins and Slack, 1999;Douglas et al, 2000), Scandinavia (Lindstrom and Bergstrom, 2004), Canada (Zhang et al, 2001;Burn and Hag Elnur, 2002;Yue and Wang, 2002) and more recently, a global assessment by Svensson et al (2005). These studies present evidence of significant variability, but there are many inherent obstacles to attributing observed trends to climate change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely used approaches are based on the Bonferroni equality (Simes, 1986) or modifications of that test (e.g., Rice, 1989;Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). Other MCPs used in the fields of climate and hydrology include the field significance tests introduced by Livezey and Chen (1983), Vogel and Kroll (1989), and Douglas et al (2000). Field significance is the collective significance of a group of hypothesis tests.…”
Section: Field Significance Tests For the Uniform Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%