Trends in International Strategic Management Research From 2000 to 2013: Text Mining and Bibliometric Analyses

White, George O.; Guldiken, Orhun; Hemphill, Thomas A.; He, Wu; Khoobdeh, Mehdi Sharifi

doi:10.1007/s11575-015-0260-9

Cited by 60 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 140 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This validates the research limitations often pointed out in bibliometrics studies in the field of strategic management, which rely on one or few journals and usually recommend broadening of the data to perform a more comprehensive analysis (Koseoglu, 2016b;Ramos-Rodríguez & Ruíz-Navarro, 2004;L. Tan & Ding, 2015;White et al, 2016).…”

Section: Institutionssupporting

confidence: 80%

Transatlantic Affiliations of Scientific Collaboration in Strategic Management: A Quarter-Century of Bibliometric Evidence

Kosch

Szarucki

2020

Journal of Business Economics and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main objective of the paper is to identify and explore patterns and dynamics of transatlantic scientific collaboration in the field of strategic management between the United States (US) and European countries (EUC) during the last quarter century. Scholarly connections between countries, cities and institutions on the basis of co-author affiliations were analysed to determine the knowledge flow from a geographical perspective. This is the first time international scientific collaboration between researchers in the field of strategic management has been studied to such an extent. We employed all sources of relevant data from the Web of Science and Scopus databases and explored 453 results. Utilizing a bibliometric analysis, our study offers a comprehensive and up-todate identification and assessment of the current situation and dynamics of transatlantic scientific collaboration. The obtained results confirm the dominant role of the US in this type of collaboration. Also, the dominant role of several clusters in terms of collaboration, both on country and institution levels can also be observed. The study confirms the weaker position of Eastern and Central Europe countries in this collaboration and provides some recommendations to increase this type of knowledge exchange in the future.

show abstract

Section: Institutionssupporting

confidence: 80%

Transatlantic Affiliations of Scientific Collaboration in Strategic Management: A Quarter-Century of Bibliometric Evidence

Kosch

Szarucki

2020

Journal of Business Economics and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We performed a bibliometric citation analysis using HistCite on our retrieved collection of 158 publications and their number of citations. Bibliometric citation analysis has become popular in many fields in the past few years (e.g., Chatterjee and Sahasranamam, 2018;Apriliyanti and Alon, 2017;White et al, 2016;Fetscherin and Heinrich, 2015;Collinson and Rugman, 2010) as it estimates the influence of publications (or documents), authors, and journals via citation rates. In this context, citations are viewed as a measure of influence or impact.…”

Section: Bibliometric Citation Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Country of origin was measured along the corresponding authors of each publication (which is one way to measure country of origin). As per White et al (2016), we calculated a weighted score based on the authorship for the total number of publications: single authors receive a score of 1, authors with only one co-author receive 1/2, authors with two co-authors receive a score of 1/3, etc. We present the top 15 authors in terms of the weighted score in Table 3.…”

Section: The Most Prolific Authorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cultural intelligence, global mindset, and cross-cultural competencies: a systematic review using bibliometric methods

Yari

Lankut

Alon

et al. 2020

EJIM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We conducted a systematic review of 158 publications on Cultural Intelligence (CQ) and related concepts, Global Mindset (GM), and Crosscultural Competence (CC) using bibliometric methods. We apply citation analysis to highlight the most influential (in terms of citations) journals, publications, and specific researchers in the field. We apply factor and cluster analyses to analyse co-citations to identify the current knowledge structure in the research field. With content coding on the resulting groups of co-citations, we identify five research streams showing the overlap between the CQ, GM, and CC constructs, and also revealing the separations in the research on the constructs. We perform burst analyses to identify trends and emerging topics or streams. Building on this, we outline future research opportunities.Cultural intelligence, global mindset, and cross-cultural competencies 211

show abstract

“…As obras inseridas nesse grupo defendem a lógica que o conhecimento é o mais importante recurso estratégico da organização. Especificamente, a literatura tem muitas vezes utilizado da teoria da aprendizagem organizacional no subcampo da formulação da estratégia corporativa em estudos como, por exemplo, de gestão estratégica internacional (White, Guldiken, Hemphill, Wu, & Khoobdeh, 2016).…”

Section: Inovação Conhecimento E Aprendizagem Na Pesquisa Em Estratégiaunclassified

“…Portanto, as teorias no campo da estratégia tem variado ao longo dos anos, White et al (2016) ao analisarem a tendência da pesquisa em gestão estratégica internacional mostraram que a visão baseada no conhecimento, a RBV, aprendizagem organizacional foram aplicadas de forma consistente no período de 2000 a 2013. O que de certa forma se confirma a aplicação dessas teorias ao campo da estratégia.…”

Section: Capability Na Pesquisa Em Estratégiaunclassified

A Pesquisa em Administração Estratégica: Um Estudo Bibliométrico em Periódicos Internacionais de Estratégia no Período de 2008 A 2013

Pinto

Guerrazzi

Serra

et al. 2016

RIAE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMONeste estudo analisamos o campo científico da estratégia por meio de uma leitura sobre as produções científicas publicadas em periódicos internacionais de estratégia com alto fator de impacto, nos últimos cinco anos. A natureza desse trabalho foi viabilizada por meio do método bibliométrico, pela análise de citação e cocitações, sendo utilizada conjuntamente a análise fatorial, que nos permitiu levantarmos as principais tendências teóricas desenvolvidas dentro do campo da estratégia, bem como a conexão existente entre os principais autores. Os dados coletados a partir do método bibliométrico elucidaram as abordagens teóricas utilizadas: a Resource Based View -RBV, Inovação, Conhecimento, Aprendizagem e Capability. Os resultados confirmaram a tendência apontada por estudos anteriores da emergência da RBV, pois foi identificada a predominância também dessa teoria nos trabalhos aqui analisados, bem como sua relação com conhecimento, aprendizagem organizacional, e com inovação. Portanto esse estudo contribui para ampliar o entendimento das escolas de pensamento que atualmente permeiam o campo da estratégia, para que assim possam orientar futuros estudos nesse campo com base nas lacunas conceituais identificadas.Palavras Chave: Estratégia. Bibliometria. Análise de citação e cocitações. Visão Baseada em Recursos. ABSTRACTIn this study we analyzed the scientific field of strategy through a research of the academic production published in international top-ranked strategy journals in the last five years. This work was made possible through the bibliometric method, using citation and co-citations analysis, and jointly with the use of factor analysis to rise up the main theoretical trends developed within the field of strategy, and the connection between the main authors. The data collected through the bibliometric tools allowed us to identify the most used theoretical approaches: the Resource Based View -RBV, Innovation, Knowledge, Learning and Capability. The results confirm the trend reported by previous studies about the emergence of RBV, since it was identified the predominance of this theory in the works analyzed here, as well as its relationship with knowledge, organizational learning, and innovation. Therefore this study contributes to extend the understanding of the main theoretical approaches that currently permeate the field of strategy, so that they can guide future studies in this field based on the identified conceptual gaps.

show abstract

Trends in International Strategic Management Research From 2000 to 2013: Text Mining and Bibliometric Analyses

Cited by 60 publications

References 140 publications

Transatlantic Affiliations of Scientific Collaboration in Strategic Management: A Quarter-Century of Bibliometric Evidence

Transatlantic Affiliations of Scientific Collaboration in Strategic Management: A Quarter-Century of Bibliometric Evidence

Cultural intelligence, global mindset, and cross-cultural competencies: a systematic review using bibliometric methods

A Pesquisa em Administração Estratégica: Um Estudo Bibliométrico em Periódicos Internacionais de Estratégia no Período de 2008 A 2013

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About