2019
DOI: 10.7227/jbr.5.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in James Baldwin Criticism, 2015–16

Abstract: This review article charts the general direction of scholarship in James Baldwin studies between the years 2015 and 2016, reflecting on important scholarly events and publications of the period and identifying notable trends in criticism. While these years witnessed a continuing interest in the relationship of Baldwin's work to other authors and art forms as well as his transnational literary imagination, noted in previous scholarly reviews, three newly emergent trends are notable: an increased attention to Ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In her 2015-16 Bibliographic Essay, Jenny M. James highlighted a "burgeoning archival turn" in Baldwin scholarship. 31 That trend received a major boost in April 2017 when it was announced that the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture, a division of the New York Public Library in Harlem, had acquired a substantial new collection of Baldwin's papers. The acquisition included over seventy boxes of material, including a rich trove of manuscripts, drafts, notes, letters, and audio tapes, most of which had never been seen before.…”
Section: Mcbride and Douglas Field Writementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In her 2015-16 Bibliographic Essay, Jenny M. James highlighted a "burgeoning archival turn" in Baldwin scholarship. 31 That trend received a major boost in April 2017 when it was announced that the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture, a division of the New York Public Library in Harlem, had acquired a substantial new collection of Baldwin's papers. The acquisition included over seventy boxes of material, including a rich trove of manuscripts, drafts, notes, letters, and audio tapes, most of which had never been seen before.…”
Section: Mcbride and Douglas Field Writementioning
confidence: 99%