2013
DOI: 10.1177/1049909113492371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in Length of Hospice Care From 1996 to 2007 and the Factors Associated With Length of Hospice Care in 2007

Abstract: Using the National Home and Hospice Care Surveys, we examined trends in length of hospice care from 1996 to 2007 and the factors associated with length of care in 2007. Results suggest that the increasing average lengths of care over time reflect the increase in the longest duration of care. For-profit ownership is associated with hospice care received for over a year.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Families were enrolled in hospice an average of 82.6 days (54 median, SD=75.9). Our reported length of stay is longer than the U.S. national average [26] [14], as patients who died before they were able to have a recorded visit were excluded. Recording most frequently began at the median (6 th ) visit after enrollment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Families were enrolled in hospice an average of 82.6 days (54 median, SD=75.9). Our reported length of stay is longer than the U.S. national average [26] [14], as patients who died before they were able to have a recorded visit were excluded. Recording most frequently began at the median (6 th ) visit after enrollment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, assessing QOL of advanced cancer patients every 2–3 weeks was found to provide similar data retention (94% [86%–98%]) as twice weekly assessments (93% [89%–98%]), but with less patient data burden (Hollen, Gralla, & Rittenberg, ). Since not all our participants were receiving hospice care [patients tend to be referred to/receive hospice care late in their disease trajectory (Sengupta, Park‐Lee, Valverde, Caffrey, & Jones, )], we decided to use a 2‐week interval for follow‐up assessments to include the largest number of subjects at each assessment. This schedule covered the most rapid changes in patients’ physical condition and the most demanding period of caregiving before the patient's death, but was balanced with data validity, participants’ data burden and data‐collection costs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, participants may have had longer hospice stays than the national average (Sengupta et al, 2014), which may have given these hospices more opportunities to interact with caregivers in meaningful ways. This limitation, therefore, may suggest that the results are conservative, that is, caregivers more generally may be even less likely to engage in bereavement-related conversations with hospice staff members than the participants of this study.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%