2013
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.288
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in maternal age distribution and the live birth prevalence of Down’s syndrome in England and Wales: 1938–2010

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
46
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unclear whether this evolution relates to screening performance, changed population characteristics and/or parental choice. A rising trend of T21 affected pregnancies is observed in many other countries; however LBPD mostly remains constant …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It is unclear whether this evolution relates to screening performance, changed population characteristics and/or parental choice. A rising trend of T21 affected pregnancies is observed in many other countries; however LBPD mostly remains constant …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…3 The estimated prevalence is likely to be accurate before screening for Down's syndrome in England and Wales started in the early 1970s. From 1970 to 1989, maternal age was the main factor used to identify pregnant women judged to be at a high risk of a Down's syndrome pregnancy.…”
Section: Live Birth Prevalence Of Down's Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, live birth prevalence remained stable at around 1.0 per 1000 over these periods (Loane et al . ; Wu & Morris ). In the DS group aged 35–40 years, the drop in population prevalence may therefore be primarily attributed to the availability of selective abortion, combined with low mean maternal age around 1975 (Wu & Morris ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%