2008
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2008.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in rates of trabeculectomy in England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various studies documented a rapid decline in trabeculectomy rates from the late 1990s; this study aims to identify if these trends have been sustained and investigate the impact on other glaucoma surgeries 1–5 10…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various studies documented a rapid decline in trabeculectomy rates from the late 1990s; this study aims to identify if these trends have been sustained and investigate the impact on other glaucoma surgeries 1–5 10…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in trabeculectomy rates was reported in Leicester from 7.57/100 000 in 2005 to 18.87/100 000 in 2009 12. This increase in trabeculectomy rate was disputed by Keenan et al who suggest that disparities in population demographics, prevalence and severity of glaucoma and variations in management will account for differences between national and local trends 10. The small increase in national trabeculectomy rates observed in this study may be due to demographic shifts in an aging population, however, it may represent a delay in surgery rather than prevention in surgery secondary to glaucoma drops 2 5…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maps showing the person-based RD rate (first recorded episode only) per 100 000 resident population for each GOR/LA were constructed. Results are expressed as average annual rates as described previously 16. The geographical data were age-standardised using the indirect method, in 5-year age groups, and age-specific rates in the total population of England as the standard.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review investigating inequalities accessing eye services in the UK found an association poor SES and poor attendance of eye health services [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] ; late stage of eye disease at presentation to eye services [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64] ; uncorrected refractive error 65,66 ; increased waiting times for treatment 67,68 ; and poor treatment compliance.- 64,69 Articles meeting the inclusion criteria have been extracted and evaluated in Tables 2 and 5. There was an equal split between articles reporting no association and those reporting a significant association between poor SES and access to eye services.…”
Section: Socioeconomicmentioning
confidence: 99%