Trends in research on climate change and organizations: a bibliometric analysis (1999–2021)

Tautiva, Julián Andrés Diaz; Huaman, Joana; Oliva, Roberto D. Ponce

doi:10.1007/s11301-022-00298-1

Cited by 20 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 133 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the first phase, we identified the main research focus by considering the literature in the business, environmental and social sciences that deals with corporate responses to climate change and decarbonization. Next, we considered a search strategy to identify keywords in several academic search engines and databases, inspired by a recent review on the subject of climate change and organizations (Díaz Tautiva et al 2022). It was important that keywords reflect corporate responses to climate change and deep decarbonization, which makes it different from previous reviews.…”

Section: Conducting the Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While previous academic articles and literature reviews have advanced theories and empirical insights related to corporate responses to climate change, including political shifts and developments (Wimbadi and Djalante 2020), management theories related to climate change (Daddi et al 2018), bibliometric analyses of the most common authors and trending concepts (Díaz Tautiva et al 2022), and drivers and barriers of low-carbon operations (Lopes de Sousa , the literature still has not grasped if corporate efforts will lead to significant reductions of CO2e, referred to as deep decarbonization in this paper. Furthermore, no systematic review has yet paid close attention to the use of language dealing with significant CO2e reductions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Beyond conventional corporate responses to climate change towards deep decarbonization: a systematic literature review

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the past 20 years, the literature on corporate responses to climate change has offered a vast array of theoretical and practical insights into organizational efforts to reduce business-related carbon emissions. However, it remains unclear whether these efforts will result in significant reductions of carbon emissions. Presently, it becomes crucial to understand, if, why, and how companies can effectively respond to the current challenges of deep decarbonization, defined as the process of emission reduction down to, or close to, zero to limit global warming. By means of a systematic literature review with 370 identified papers, we are able to categorize the main findings of the literature according to the four most common areas of investigation, including drivers, actions, barriers, and facilitators. Additionally, we conduct a comparative analysis of the literature along these four areas of investigation according to two categories: conventional responses and deep decarbonization responses. The results show that the literature on conventional responses to climate change (n = 321) extensively covers all four areas of investigation; however, it only touches on the descriptive (i.e., ‘what’) aspects of decarbonization. The recent and emerging literature on deep decarbonization responses (n = 49) provides novel insights on the prescriptive (i.e., ‘why’ and ‘how’) aspects of deep decarbonization. However, this literature is restricted to mostly regional and industrial foci, and it does not connect drivers, barriers, and facilitators in a systematic way. Thus, we highlight key implications for future research and practice in order to effectively address corporate deep decarbonization.

show abstract

Section: Conducting the Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond conventional corporate responses to climate change towards deep decarbonization: a systematic literature review

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The identification stage considers important factors, including source type, search engine, category, language, period and keywords (Tautiva et al, 2022). This research specifically targets journal articles, excluding other types of publications such as books, book chapters and proceedings, because these documents undergo stringent procedures, thereby ensuring higher quality compared to other types of documents (Harsanto & Firmansyah, 2023).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Navigating Global Cyberspace: An Extensive Bibliometric Journey through Digital Financial Literacy and Accounting Research

Azaria,

Noviani

2024

EAJMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite the growing interest in digital financial literacy and accounting research, there is a lack of a comprehensive summary in the literature. This study aims to fill this gap by providing an up-to-date overview of the literature on digital financial literacy and accounting. Using the PRISMA protocol and VOSViewer, we analyze extensive data from Scopus spanning 2013 to 2024. Similarly, this study encompasses of co-occurrence and co-authorship analyses. The findings show a significant increase in related research, reaching its peak in 2023, driven by increased publishing opportunities and efforts, particularly in Asia and the United States. Strong organizational support, such as universities and funding sponsors, also contributes to this growth. In conclusion, this study offers a clear synthesis of the literature on digital financial literacy and accounting, suggesting potential areas for future research.

show abstract

“…Research on sustainability, inequality, digitalization, and management for non-profits will receive greater attention in MRQ as the journal moves forward. Recent MRQ articles on climate change and organizations (Díaz Tautiva et al 2022), (corporate) environmental sustainability and performance (Bhatt and Ghuman 2022;Kwarto et al 2022), corporate social responsibility (Rojas Molina et al 2022;Frerichs and Teichert 2021), non-profits (Nordin et al 2022) social enterprises (Armstrong and Grobbelaar 2022), supply chain management (Durugbo and Al-Balushi 2022) and entrepreneurship (Kuckertz and Brändle 2022) in crises show the way forward. We intend to publish more of such empirically grounded and practically relevant research.…”

Section: Thoughts For the Next 5 Yearsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Looking back to look ahead: MRQ's past five years of evidence-based management research in numbers

Block

Brändle²

2022

Manag Rev Q

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The literature base of business and management research is constantly growing and becoming more complex. Hence, the need for an evidence-focused review journal such as Management Review Quarterly (MRQ) is also growing. Literature reviews, meta-analyses, replications, and bibliographic studies help to consolidate and integrate the field's evidence and knowledge and set the agenda for future research. MRQ has found its place in the management field and has seen a constant rise in the number of submissions and impact. This editorial aims to take stock. It looks back to look ahead by reflecting on the number of submissions, the journal's scope in terms of international coverage, methods, and topics, and its impact over the last five years. The editorial closes with an outlook for the next five years and discusses the uniqueness of MRQ as an evidence-focused review journal.

show abstract

Trends in research on climate change and organizations: a bibliometric analysis (1999–2021)

Cited by 20 publications

References 133 publications

Beyond conventional corporate responses to climate change towards deep decarbonization: a systematic literature review

Beyond conventional corporate responses to climate change towards deep decarbonization: a systematic literature review

Navigating Global Cyberspace: An Extensive Bibliometric Journey through Digital Financial Literacy and Accounting Research

Looking back to look ahead: MRQ's past five years of evidence-based management research in numbers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About