“…Referring to the SACMEQ III dataset for South Africa, Spaull (2012) remarked that a school's SES had a far greater impact on school learner performance than individual learner's socio-economic background. In addition, Mitchell et al (2018, p. 435) have drawn attention to how the locally developed intelligence test battery, namely the SSAIS-R, is 'somewhat biased to educational exposure, in particular verbal and linguistic abilities', which further supports the argument for unfair, inapplicable intelligence measuring instruments where careful interpretation of intelligence measured results is needed, especially of school learners who attend schools within lower socio-economic contexts (Laher et al, 2019;Mitchell et al, 2018;Shuttleworth-Edwards, 2023). Intelligence tests and instruments still function as essential means towards school learner guidance and support, where the combination of interpreted measured cognitive abilities (e.g., their strengths and challenges) and other findings (e.g., learner background information or observations from testing) aid the practitioner in developing applicable intervention strategies (Beal et al, 2019).…”