2001
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in the Mortality (1950–1997) and Incidence (1975–1993) of Malignant Ovarian Neoplasm among Japanese Women: Analyses by Age, Time, and Birth Cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence rate of ovarian cancer has increased during the last few decades in Japan, 13,14) while the relative 5-year survival has remained approximately constant at a little less than 40%. 2) There are increasing demands for improvement in the treatment of ovarian cancer patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence rate of ovarian cancer has increased during the last few decades in Japan, 13,14) while the relative 5-year survival has remained approximately constant at a little less than 40%. 2) There are increasing demands for improvement in the treatment of ovarian cancer patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10) Tamakoshi et al 4) have reported a rise in incidence in Japan from 1975 to 1993. Our present study showed that there has been a rising pattern only in the incidence rate of carcinoma (from 3.4 to 4.8 per 100 000 women).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8) The effect of age on the incidence of ovarian cancer agreed well with that found in previous studies in Japan: the rates increased steadily in older age groups. 4,5) Histologic diversity is, however, characteristic of this cancer and a population-based study with respect to histologic type of ovarian cancer has never been reported in Japan. In this paper we have tried to clarify the analysis of incidence and survival of ovarian cancer by histologic type, using the Osaka Cancer Registry's data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population * Ferlay et al, 2010 2008 World U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group, 2010Group, 2007 United States (99.1%) Koper et al, 19961989-1991Netherlands Ioka et al, 20031975-1998 Osaka, Japan Mahdy et al, 19991988-1997Alexandria, Egypt Zambon et al, 20041986-1997 Several regions in Italy Kohler et al, 2011Rates: 2003-2007Trends: 1998Trends: -2007 United States (93%) Tamakoshi et al, 2001Tamakoshi et al, 1975Tamakoshi et al, -1993 Several regions in Japan Jin et al,19931979-1989Shanghai, China Dey et al, 20101999-2002Tanta, Egypt Minelli et al, 20071998-2002 Umbria, Italy 1992-1997 United States (52%) Goodman et al, 1992Goodman et al, -1997 United States (52%) Boger-Megiddo & Weiss, 20051992-2000 United States (26%) Stiller, 2007NR World Brookfield et al, 20091973-2005 United States (9%) Poynter et al, 2010Poynter et al, 1975Poynter et al, -2006 United...…”
Section: Author and Publication Year Data Year(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for this decrease are unclear, but are likely not artefactual due to the long-standing high-quality data available for the United States. A Japanese analysis based on data from several regional cancer registries reported a 1.5 fold increase in ovarian cancer rates from 1975 to 1993 (Tamakoshi et al, 2001). The Chinese Shanghai Cancer Registry also reported an increase in ovarian cancer incidence from 1979-1989(Jin et al, 1993.…”
Section: Author and Publication Year Data Year(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%