2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in the Prenatal Detection of Major Congenital Heart Disease in Alberta From 2008–2018

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although determination of which of the above factors most influences gestational age at diagnosis is the focus of future study in this field, we observed an improvement in prenatal diagnosis of major CHD and rate of diagnosis < 22 weeks during the study period. We speculate that improvements in obstetric screening guidelines and ultrasound equipment, as well as fetal heart‐focused workshops provided by the fetal cardiology service for obstetric sonographers may have contributed to this 31 . Further work will aim to improve the skills of those performing and reviewing prenatal screening examinations, with mapping of sites with the lowest rates of detection that could be targeted for such interventions first.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although determination of which of the above factors most influences gestational age at diagnosis is the focus of future study in this field, we observed an improvement in prenatal diagnosis of major CHD and rate of diagnosis < 22 weeks during the study period. We speculate that improvements in obstetric screening guidelines and ultrasound equipment, as well as fetal heart‐focused workshops provided by the fetal cardiology service for obstetric sonographers may have contributed to this 31 . Further work will aim to improve the skills of those performing and reviewing prenatal screening examinations, with mapping of sites with the lowest rates of detection that could be targeted for such interventions first.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early reports of prenatal sCHD detection rates from 2000 to 2010 had a broad range from 15% to 59%, 16 while reports since 2010 have ranged from 30% to 88%. 31,[37][38][39][40] This improvement likely stemmed from technical advances in ultrasound technology, improved sonographer training, better scrutiny of outflow tract views, and implementation of a three-vessel and trachea view. We compared our results to studies published since 2010 14,23-32 and found that our overall live-born detection rate of 62% (CI 56-68) was comparable, validating the efficacy of the described referral paradigm, which recommends a referral to pediatric cardiology for cardiac abnormalities alone, excluding fetal and maternal risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A regional study in the Netherlands from 2002 to 2012 noted significantly higher prenatal detection rates (93%) in single ventricle lesions, with an overall CHD prenatal detection rate of 59% [24]. In Alberta, Canada between 2008 and 2018, 58% of major CHD was diagnosed prenatally with higher detection rates of 82% for lesions requiring the four-chamber view versus those 66% of those requiring the outflow tract view [25]. More recent studies done after the 2013 modified guidelines [12] in the United States and internationally have continued to show variable and wide ranges of prenatal diagnosis rates, with CHD diagnosable by the standard four-chamber view more often diagnosed prenatally (Table 6) [5,22,26,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%