Trends in United States neurosurgery residency education and training over the last decade (2009–2019)

Abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>OBJECTIVE</jats:title><jats:p>Postgraduate training in medicine has been under scrutiny in the last 10 years, with a focus on improving residents’ education. The aim of this study was to quantify trends in neurosurgery residency (NSR) training and education over the last 10 years.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>METHODS</jats:title><jats:p>The authors assessed Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), National Resident Matching Program, and American Board of Neurological Surgeons records and searched PubMed to collate 2009–2019 data. Analyzed trends included residents’ demographic data, programs’ characteristics, graduation and attrition rates, match data, resident case logs, and qualitative educational curriculum changes.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>RESULTS</jats:title><jats:p>Significant increases in residents’ demographic data (p &lt; 0.05) included the number of female residents (from 12.7% to 17.6%) and the absolute number of residents (from 1112 to 1462). Age (mean 28.8 years), ethnicity, and number of residents per program (mean 13 residents per program) were unchanged. There were 16 new ACGME NSR programs, with currently 115 programs nationwide. The number of applicants per year (324 applicants per year) and the matching rate (mean 64%) remained stable. The mean attrition rate of 2.6% (range 2%–4%) was higher than the mean 2.1% ACGME attrition rate, a rate that decreased from 3% in 2009 to 1.6% in 2019. Education curriculum changes aimed at the standardization of training across the US included residents’ boot camp (2009), the Milestones project (2012), and mandatory 7-year training initiated in 2013. An increase in endovascular, functional, trauma, and spine resident caseload was noted. The number of yearly publications about US NSR education has significantly increased (p &lt; 0.05).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>CONCLUSIONS</jats:title><jats:p>NSR education has received greater attention over the last decade in the US. Standardization of training has been implemented. A steady number of students remain interested in neurosurgery, with an increased number of women entering the field. Attention to wellness, in addition to high-quality education, should be further assessed as a factor to improve the overall NSR training and retention rate.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Medical Student Concerns Relating to Neurosurgery Education During COVID-19

“…The present study, however, did successfully capture a large, geographically diverse, cohort of U.S. medical students. For example, 34 of our respondents were M3 students, which, given that the average number of U.S. neurosurgery residency applicants during the previous 5 years was 247, 13 our study included~13.8% of next year's applicant cohort. In addition, the cohort of students included in our study included greater proportions of female and ethnic or racial minority students compared with the 2018-2019 U.S. neurosurgery residents found in the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education database.…”

Letter to the Editor “Changes to Neurosurgery Resident Education Since Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic”

“…The dramatic decrease in operative cases has significantly affected the training of neurosurgical residents, who depend on elective surgical volume to hone their clinical and operative skills. 2 Because residents must meet minimum case volumes to show proficiency on program completion, 3 there is concern among both residents and program directors (PDs) regarding the severity of the impact of COVID-19 on neurosurgical resident education. 4 Recently, several centers have reported the significant changes that their departments have undergone as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.…”

Innovation and New Technologies in Spine Surgery, Circa 2020: A Fifty-Year Review

“…The effect of surgeon training as an innovation in process was not evaluated in detail in this mini-review. Surgeon training can have positive influences on patient outcomes and there has been interesting research performed in this area (39)(40)(41). The effect of training was thought to be difficult to evaluate with both a scientific and intellectual property perspective.…”