“…These initiatives have rarely been evaluated in terms of their impact on outcomes, with evaluations often simply focussing on process measures such as provider acceptability (Blakeman et al, 2001;Harris et al, 2002;Zwar et al, 2005;Rhee et al, 2012), uptake (Price et al, 2002;Wilkinson et al, 2002a;Wilkinson et al, 2002bWilkinson et al, , 2003Hamirudin et al, 2015) and impact on allied health services (Cant and Aroni, 2007;Foster et al, 2008;Menz, 2009;Haines et al, 2010). The few outcome evaluations have been mildly positive, showing that the introduction of the Enhanced Primary Care items was associated with improved diabetes care ; that a 45+ health check was associated with change in patient exercise patterns but not clinical measures (Amoroso et al, 2009); and that a falls prevention programme funded through use of the chronic disease management items reduced falls (Mackenzie and Clemson, 2014).…”