2015
DOI: 10.1071/py14074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in uptake of the 75+ health assessment in Australia: a decade of evaluation

Abstract: In Australia, older adults aged 75+ years are encouraged to avail themselves of the comprehensive 75+ health assessment (75+ HA) to identify medical conditions and highlight potential risk factors for poor health. However, uptake of this item has been reported to be low. This study aimed to identify the uptake of the 75+ HA within regional areas of New South Wales and compare this against state and national trends over an 11-year period. Data on uptake of the 75+ HA for item numbers 700 and 702, from 1999 unti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As one GP observed: However, there was no consensus regarding when universal screening should start, with the broad age range proposed being 50-75 years. Participants proposing the age of 75 years generally rationalised this by linking it to the 75+ health assessment (a free annual health check), 44 but others thought that this was too late. Some GPs felt that targeted screening in the sense of case-finding for patients who were already frail might also prove useful.…”
Section: One Is Detecting At Risk … Versus One Already With a Conditimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one GP observed: However, there was no consensus regarding when universal screening should start, with the broad age range proposed being 50-75 years. Participants proposing the age of 75 years generally rationalised this by linking it to the 75+ health assessment (a free annual health check), 44 but others thought that this was too late. Some GPs felt that targeted screening in the sense of case-finding for patients who were already frail might also prove useful.…”
Section: One Is Detecting At Risk … Versus One Already With a Conditimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These initiatives have rarely been evaluated in terms of their impact on outcomes, with evaluations often simply focussing on process measures such as provider acceptability (Blakeman et al, 2001;Harris et al, 2002;Zwar et al, 2005;Rhee et al, 2012), uptake (Price et al, 2002;Wilkinson et al, 2002a;Wilkinson et al, 2002bWilkinson et al, , 2003Hamirudin et al, 2015) and impact on allied health services (Cant and Aroni, 2007;Foster et al, 2008;Menz, 2009;Haines et al, 2010). The few outcome evaluations have been mildly positive, showing that the introduction of the Enhanced Primary Care items was associated with improved diabetes care ; that a 45+ health check was associated with change in patient exercise patterns but not clinical measures (Amoroso et al, 2009); and that a falls prevention programme funded through use of the chronic disease management items reduced falls (Mackenzie and Clemson, 2014).…”
Section: Management Of Chronic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, data for up to 2008-9 show that the 75-84 age group made greater use of the assessments than the 85C age group and that women in the latter age group made greater use than men. 33 The most disadvantaged populations have similar or higher levels of uptake of the extended primary care services in total (which include both chronic disease management plan services and the health assessments). 34 Overall though, only about one-fifth of the eligible population has received a health assessment.…”
Section: Reorienting Primary Health Services To Address Aging In Austmentioning
confidence: 99%