2020
DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in very early discharge from hospital for newborns under midwifery care in Ontario from 2003 to 2017: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract: Background: Very early discharge from hospital is an element of Ontario midwifery care. Our aim in the present study was to describe the frequency of very early hospital discharge for newborns in Ontario midwifery care over time. Methods:We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study, including all midwife-attended singleton term cephalic newborns delivered by spontaneous vaginal birth at Ontario hospitals between April 2003 and February 2017. Our primary outcome was very early hospital discharge (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, others reported shorter LOS associated with newborn mortality and neonatal UHR [ 51 , 55 ]. The heterogeneity of the study population may explain the lack of consensus in the different studies, such as the newborn’s GA or birth weight, mode of delivery and parity, access to maternity care, availability of follow-up services, and/or parental knowledge and competence [ 56 ]. The inconsistent results highlight the importance of discharge readiness assessment, including newborn clinical fitness for discharge and parental readiness for discharge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, others reported shorter LOS associated with newborn mortality and neonatal UHR [ 51 , 55 ]. The heterogeneity of the study population may explain the lack of consensus in the different studies, such as the newborn’s GA or birth weight, mode of delivery and parity, access to maternity care, availability of follow-up services, and/or parental knowledge and competence [ 56 ]. The inconsistent results highlight the importance of discharge readiness assessment, including newborn clinical fitness for discharge and parental readiness for discharge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Internationally, some newborn discharges are accomplished within 6 hours of birth. 8 Additionally, physiologic changes and the potential timing of presentation of neonatal pathology must be considered. 9 At the initiation of the management change, due to New York State screening regulations and required testing, 6,7 it was deemed a minimum of a 24-hour stay was necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Babies discharged before 24 hours typically return home at about 6 hours of life, 18 too early to describe meaningful breastfeeding rates. These newborns were excluded as “early discharges.” Most newborns remain in hospital at least 24 hours (the minimum age for newborn metabolic screening).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Babies discharged before 24 hours typically return home at about 6 hours of life, 18 too early to describe meaningful breastfeeding rates. These newborns were excluded as "early discharges."…”
Section: Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%