2018
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aab5da
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends of atmospheric circulation during singular hot days in Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7). These results are also broadly consistent with the fact that (Jézéquel et al 2018a) found negligible trends in single-day circulation analogue frequency over the observational record for two European heat events, while (Yiou et al 2017) found robust changes to the frequency of resampled 31-day analogue sequences related to the unusually wet January of 2014 over the Southern UK. While the differences are stark between Figs.…”
Section: Reconciling Differences Between Changes To the Frequency Of supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7). These results are also broadly consistent with the fact that (Jézéquel et al 2018a) found negligible trends in single-day circulation analogue frequency over the observational record for two European heat events, while (Yiou et al 2017) found robust changes to the frequency of resampled 31-day analogue sequences related to the unusually wet January of 2014 over the Southern UK. While the differences are stark between Figs.…”
Section: Reconciling Differences Between Changes To the Frequency Of supporting
confidence: 85%
“…A warming world might influence how often weather patterns conducive to exceptionally hot weather will occur over Central Europe (Jézéquel et al 2018a;Woollings et al 2018), as well as how warm summertime temperature maxima will reach. However, our results show further work is needed to properly quantify the uncertainty of these changes, both to understand the evolution of changes in the past and as warming continues into the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are defined as those days with root-mean-square error of the anomalous Z500 field over (30°W to 15°E, 30-55°N), with respect to the same field during the mentioned 47 days, below their 5th percentile (Jézéquel et al, 2018). For each day from the SSW onset until the end of March 2018 (+47 days after the 2018 SSW), we counted the number of good analogues found in the reanalysis period (excluding that winter).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each day from the SSW onset until the end of March 2018 (+47 days after the 2018 SSW), we counted the number of good analogues found in the reanalysis period (excluding that winter). They are defined as those days with root-mean-square error of the anomalous Z500 field over (30°W to 15°E, 30-55°N), with respect to the same field during the mentioned 47 days, below their 5th percentile (Jézéquel et al, 2018). To identify a stratospheric influence, the search was separated into winter days after SSWs (with SSWs, from now on) and the remaining winter days of 1979-2017.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We determine the temperature distribution conditional to atmospheric patterns that are similar to 2018 changes with time. Following the procedure of Jézéquel et al (2018b), we computed analogs of geopotential height at 500 mb (Z500) over a zone covering Scandinavia (rectangle in Fig. 1c), which optimizes the temperature/circulation correspondence.…”
Section: Conditional Attributionmentioning
confidence: 99%