2017
DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20164499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends of ectopic pregnancies in Andaman and Nicobar Islands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

18
28
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
18
28
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to the study of Shaikh BN et al and Shanti Suri Asuri where 38% and 40.5% patients were brought in a state of shock. 16,8 Classic triad of pain, bleeding and amenorrhea was seen in 15 (31.9%) patients in our study which is similar to the study of Priyadarshini B. et al 8 In the present study, previous medical abortions and previous lower segment caesarean section were present in 17% and 12.8% patients respectively, which is quite comparable to the studies done by Priyadarshini Et al, Shanti Suri Asuri, Yadav et al and Saha et al 8,16,18,19 We found that history of infertility treatment was there in 8.5% patients almost similar to the studies of Shanti Sri Asuri, March Banks and Arora et al 16,20 In contrast it was quite higher in the studies of Mitra et al (55.2%), Savitha Devi et al(48.07%), Priyadarshini B. et al (21%) and Rose et al (15.1%). 8,16,21,22 In our study history of PID was present in 6.4% patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in contrast to the study of Shaikh BN et al and Shanti Suri Asuri where 38% and 40.5% patients were brought in a state of shock. 16,8 Classic triad of pain, bleeding and amenorrhea was seen in 15 (31.9%) patients in our study which is similar to the study of Priyadarshini B. et al 8 In the present study, previous medical abortions and previous lower segment caesarean section were present in 17% and 12.8% patients respectively, which is quite comparable to the studies done by Priyadarshini Et al, Shanti Suri Asuri, Yadav et al and Saha et al 8,16,18,19 We found that history of infertility treatment was there in 8.5% patients almost similar to the studies of Shanti Sri Asuri, March Banks and Arora et al 16,20 In contrast it was quite higher in the studies of Mitra et al (55.2%), Savitha Devi et al(48.07%), Priyadarshini B. et al (21%) and Rose et al (15.1%). 8,16,21,22 In our study history of PID was present in 6.4% patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…No risk factor could be identified in 34% of patients in our study as in many other studies. 8,[16][17][18][19] We found that majority of patients had tubal ectopic pregnancy as in other studies. 18,29 However the exact site could not be made out in 53.2% patients during laparotomy due to extensive tubular damage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…7,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]18,19 This is probably because sexual activity and fertility of women is highest during this period. In the present study, 70% of the women were multiparous which was comparable with studies by Bhuria et al, Rakhi et al, Yadav et al and Prasanna et al 8,15,18,19 In the present study, the commonest site for ectopic pregnancy was tubal (92%). Among the tubal pregnancies, ampulla was the commonest site (78%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The incidence of ectopic pregnancy in other Indian studies conducted during 1996 to 2015 ranged from 0.25% to 1.9%. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] We compared the incidence of ectopic pregnancy in the institute from 2011 to 2013 and found an increase in incidence from 4.7 per 1000 deliveries to 6.3 per 1000 deliveries. Similar to our study, there was an increasing trend in the incidence of ectopic pregnancies in the studies conducted by Jophy et al (7.4 per 1000 live births to 15.2 per 1000 live births) and Porwal et al 6,7 Shobeiri et al conducted a study of 872 women with ectopic pregnancy in Iran during 2000 to 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation