2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends of intervention for paediatric stone disease over the last two decades (2000–2015): A systematic review of literature

Abstract: ObjectiveTo ascertain the publication trends of interventions for paediatric kidney stone disease (KSD) we conducted a systematic review of literature over the last 16 years.Patients and methodsWith a rise of paediatric KSD and related interventions, a systematic review using PubMed was done over the last 16 years for all published papers on ‘Paediatric stone disease intervention – ureteroscopy (URS), shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), open stone surgery, and laparoscopic stone s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SFRs reported for SWL in current literature are also inferior to that achieved by URS [22,23]. A recent study by Pietropaolo et al reveals that over the past 20 years, while SWL has been the most common treatment modality, in more recent years the dissemination of URS has risen markedly [10]. Rob et al reported that there was no significant difference in the complication rates of URS (both major and minor) between medium and highvolume paediatric centres [24].…”
Section: Role Of Swl and Pcnlmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SFRs reported for SWL in current literature are also inferior to that achieved by URS [22,23]. A recent study by Pietropaolo et al reveals that over the past 20 years, while SWL has been the most common treatment modality, in more recent years the dissemination of URS has risen markedly [10]. Rob et al reported that there was no significant difference in the complication rates of URS (both major and minor) between medium and highvolume paediatric centres [24].…”
Section: Role Of Swl and Pcnlmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, advancements related to optic systems, equipment and surgeon expertise have propelled URS as the intervention of choice for many paediatric stone cases [7,8,9]. Accordingly, its uptake and dissemination has seen a marked rise across the world since the first description of its application in the paediatric setting in 1988 by Ritchey et al [10,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ancak son yıllarda gelişen teknolojiye paralel olarak minimal invaziv cerrahi bir yöntem olan perkütan nefrolitotomi (PNL) başarısız SWL vakalarında kullanılmış ve günümüzde artık açık böbrek taşı cerrahisinin yerini almıştır (1). Yetişkin hastalarda elde edilen tecrübe ile çocuk yaş grubunda da özellikle 15 mm'den büyük veya kompleks böbrek taşlarının cerrahi tedavisinde PNL tercih edilen bir yöntem haline gelmiştir (2).…”
Section: Böbrek Taşı Olan çOcuklarda öNceki Taş Tedavisinin Perkütan Nefrolitotomi Sonuçlarına Etkisiunclassified
“…3 According to the number of publication, it seems the prevalence of kidney stone disease (KSD) and its associated intervention has been increasing, which can be explained with improved diagnostic modalities, rising in body mass index (BMI), and nutritional and ecological issues. [4][5][6][7] Regarding the high recurrence rate of kidney stones, safe and effective treatment of kidney stones is mandatory. The interventions used to remove kidney stones are as follows: Ureteroscopy (URS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCN), extra-corporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and open surgery, but open surgery for kidney stones has come to extinction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interventions used to remove kidney stones are as follows: Ureteroscopy (URS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCN), extra-corporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and open surgery, but open surgery for kidney stones has come to extinction. 5,8 The evolution of modern methods in stone surgery such as flexible ureteroscope, mini PCN and the use of laser technology revolutionizes stone treatment intervention. 1 Technological advances help us to attain better stone-free rates and offer our patients the greatest quality of care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%