2020
DOI: 10.3390/toxics8040111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends of Polychlorinated Compounds in the Surroundings of a Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator in Mataró (Catalonia, Spain): Assessing Health Risks

Abstract: Since 2008, the environmental levels of polychlorinated compounds near a municipal solid waste incinerator in Mataró (Catalonia, Spain) have been periodically monitored. The present study aimed at updating the data regarding the temporal changes occurred between 2015 and 2017, when air and soil samples were collected again, and the concentrations of the same chemical pollutants (i.e., polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)) were analysed. Furthermore… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Waste incineration plants (WIPs) have traditionally been associated with emission of toxic pollutants; however, the current generation of WIPs is far less polluting and more energy efficient than earlier types. Although the available scientific evidence suggests that actual health threats to the general public from the operation of WIPs are unlikely (Nadal et al 2020), the perception of risk from WIPs among the general population, particularly in communities surrounding such facilities, is high (Ren et al 2016). The acceptance of or resistance to WIPs depends on social and public perceptions on the effects of these facilities to their local environment and safety, a phenomenon known as 'not in my backyard' (NIMBY), and the negative effects of such NIMBYs are influenced by prior public information (Li andLi 2021, Liu et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waste incineration plants (WIPs) have traditionally been associated with emission of toxic pollutants; however, the current generation of WIPs is far less polluting and more energy efficient than earlier types. Although the available scientific evidence suggests that actual health threats to the general public from the operation of WIPs are unlikely (Nadal et al 2020), the perception of risk from WIPs among the general population, particularly in communities surrounding such facilities, is high (Ren et al 2016). The acceptance of or resistance to WIPs depends on social and public perceptions on the effects of these facilities to their local environment and safety, a phenomenon known as 'not in my backyard' (NIMBY), and the negative effects of such NIMBYs are influenced by prior public information (Li andLi 2021, Liu et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%