2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18030873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends Supporting the In-Field Use of Wearable Inertial Sensors for Sport Performance Evaluation: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Recent technological developments have led to the production of inexpensive, non-invasive, miniature magneto-inertial sensors, ideal for obtaining sport performance measures during training or competition. This systematic review evaluates current evidence and the future potential of their use in sport performance evaluation. Articles published in English (April 2017) were searched in Web-of-Science, Scopus, Pubmed, and Sport-Discus databases. A keyword search of titles, abstracts and keywords which included st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
302
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 389 publications
(348 citation statements)
references
References 350 publications
(753 reference statements)
0
302
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current generation of wearable sensors are limited by low-fidelity, low resolution, or uni-dimensional data analysis (e.g. velocity) based on gross assumptions of linear regression, which overfit to a simple movement pattern or participant cohort [7], however, researchers have reported success deriving kinematics from these devices for movement classification [40,52]. To improve on these methods, a number of research teams have sought to leverage computer vision and data science techniques, and while initial results appear promising, to date they lack validation to ground truth data, or relevance to specific sporting related tasks [8,49,53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current generation of wearable sensors are limited by low-fidelity, low resolution, or uni-dimensional data analysis (e.g. velocity) based on gross assumptions of linear regression, which overfit to a simple movement pattern or participant cohort [7], however, researchers have reported success deriving kinematics from these devices for movement classification [40,52]. To improve on these methods, a number of research teams have sought to leverage computer vision and data science techniques, and while initial results appear promising, to date they lack validation to ground truth data, or relevance to specific sporting related tasks [8,49,53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the input data of our joint impulse estimation models, we use inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors since they are easy to use outside the lab. IMU sensors are often used in human motion analysis for this reason (Bussmann et al, 2001;Weyand et al, 2001;Alvarez et al, 2008;Camomilla et al, 2018). In addition, they are relatively inexpensive to buy compared to the lab equipment needed to calculate joint contact forces.…”
Section: Input Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, such a system would be based on inexpensive, wearable sensors that the patients can easily use at the clinician's practice or even at home. Inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors and electromyography (EMG) sensors are ideal candidates for this purpose as they are relatively cheap and have been applied successfully in a wide range of human movement analysis tasks (Zhang et al, 2011;Camomilla et al, 2018;De Brabandere et al, 2018;Op De Beéck et al, 2018). Designing such a system requires collecting data in a lab setting where a subject performs the relevant exercises while simultaneously recording data from the cheap portable sensors and the expensive, standard lab sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IoT wearable monitoring is an emerging area in Healthcare 4.0 and it is changing the way we capture and process our biological data. The application domain includes remote patient monitoring services, smart home (Alaa, Zaidan, Zaidan, Talal, & Kiah, 2017), hospital patient monitoring, rehabilitation (Bisio, Delfino, Lavagetto, & Sciarrone, 2017), self-tracking, performance sports (Camomilla, Bergamini, Fantozzi, & Vannozzi, 2018), and children, youths and elderly care (Misra, Mukherjee, & Roy, 2018). IoT wearable devices supported by AI-driven intelligent data processing techniques have great potential for early detection of physiological and behavioral changes and identify clinical episodes of several chronic diseases (A. R. M. Forkan, Khalil, Tari, Foufou, & Bouras, 2015).…”
Section: Iot Wearable Remote Health Care Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%