Triage criteria in genitourinary medicine

Abstract

An audit of triage was conducted between June and September 2003 in a district general hospital genitourinary medicine department to evaluate the appropriateness of triage criteria to identify those who require urgent intervention. We selected gonorrhoea (B1), chlamydia (C4a), gential herpes (C10a/b) and epidemiological treatment of contacts of B1 or C4a (C4e/B4) as conditions requiring urgent intervention. Eighty-eight percent met one or more of the criteria and were offered urgent appointments and 69% who did not meet the criteria were offered routine appointments. The incidences of B1, C4a, C10a/b and C4e/B4 were 26.5%, 21.2%, 16.8% and 8% respectively in the urgent group compared with corresponding incidences of 4.4% and 16.2% respectively in the routine group. No cases of C10a/b or C4e/B4 were seen in the latter group. Although triage criteria did not identify asymptomatic infections, efficient contact tracing will improve detection of asymptomatic carriers of infections and should be encouraged. The outcome of the audit informed modifications to the criteria and reinforced the need for staff training in triage. In the United Kingdom, genitourinary medicine must be urgently prioritized and invested in, to improve access to all who need to be seen within 48 h of contacting the service.

The incidence of sexually related conditions in asymptomatic versus symptomatic patients

“…The recent trend of increased STDs has led sexual health providers to devise new methods to triage asymptomatic patients and new model of care. [1][2][3][4][5] When the symptoms of discharge (or its absence) are suggested as a criterion for triage, it would be reasonable to investigate further the incidence of sexually related conditions in the two patient subgroups to objectively inform the process and base practice on evidence.…”

Serologic Testing for Syphilis in the United States: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Two Screening Algorithms

“…OUTPATIENT CLINICS FOR SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED infections (STIs) are confronted with increasing visitor demands and insufficient screening capacity. [1][2][3][4][5] The STI outpatient clinic of Amsterdam's Health Service offers free STI/HIV screening, counseling, and treatment. To increase the screening capacity while using similar resources, a visitor-prioritizing system was developed to provide 2 types of service.…”

“Express testing” in STI clinics: extant literature and preliminary implementation data

“…These exclusion criteria are based on available evidence about STI/HIV testing (Sivapalan et al, 2005;Tidman et al, 2003), and were selected to ensure quality, not quantity, of care.…”