Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Objectives Emergency department (ED) crowding is detrimental to patients and staff. During traditional triage, nurses evaluate patients and identify their level of emergency. During team triage, physicians and/or nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) place orders, laboratory results, intravenous lines (IVs), and imaging in triage. Team triage improves access to testing and decreases length of stay. However, ordering practices in team triage may lead to overtesting. Methods This is a retrospective review of patients seen before and after a team triage process was established. Percentage of patients receiving testing and the diagnostic yields of troponins, lactates, international normalized ratios (INRs), blood cultures, glomerular filtration rates (GFR), and head computed tomography (CT) images were studied. Results A total of 704 traditionally triaged patients and 862 team triaged patients met inclusion criteria. Comparing traditional versus team triaged patients, the proportion of patients discharged was 0.44 versus 0.53 ( P < 0.001), and the length of stay to discharge was 417 versus 375 minutes ( P = 0.003). Comparing traditional versus team triage, a head CT was obtained 12.5% versus 5.7% ( P < 0.001) of the time with diagnostic yield 45.5% versus 52% (not significant), troponin was obtained 51.3% versus 45.9% (not significant) of the time with diagnostic yield 14.9% versus 13.9% (not significant), lactate was obtained 41.6% versus 32.1% ( P = 0.011) of the time with diagnostic yield 18.4% versus 12.3% (not significant), INR was obtained 70.2% versus 55.8% ( P = 0.007) of the time with diagnostic yield 15.8% versus 10.5% ( P = 0. 042), GFR was obtained 99.3% versus 98.4% (not significant) of the time with diagnostic yield 18.9% versus 13.7% ( P = 0.02), and blood cultures were obtained 23.4% versus 7.3% ( P < 0.001) of the time with diagnostic yield 7.3% versus 9.3% (not significant). Conclusion Compared with traditional triage, the team triage process increased discharges and decreased time to discharge, but did not lead to increased testing or decreased diagnostic yield.
Objectives Emergency department (ED) crowding is detrimental to patients and staff. During traditional triage, nurses evaluate patients and identify their level of emergency. During team triage, physicians and/or nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) place orders, laboratory results, intravenous lines (IVs), and imaging in triage. Team triage improves access to testing and decreases length of stay. However, ordering practices in team triage may lead to overtesting. Methods This is a retrospective review of patients seen before and after a team triage process was established. Percentage of patients receiving testing and the diagnostic yields of troponins, lactates, international normalized ratios (INRs), blood cultures, glomerular filtration rates (GFR), and head computed tomography (CT) images were studied. Results A total of 704 traditionally triaged patients and 862 team triaged patients met inclusion criteria. Comparing traditional versus team triaged patients, the proportion of patients discharged was 0.44 versus 0.53 ( P < 0.001), and the length of stay to discharge was 417 versus 375 minutes ( P = 0.003). Comparing traditional versus team triage, a head CT was obtained 12.5% versus 5.7% ( P < 0.001) of the time with diagnostic yield 45.5% versus 52% (not significant), troponin was obtained 51.3% versus 45.9% (not significant) of the time with diagnostic yield 14.9% versus 13.9% (not significant), lactate was obtained 41.6% versus 32.1% ( P = 0.011) of the time with diagnostic yield 18.4% versus 12.3% (not significant), INR was obtained 70.2% versus 55.8% ( P = 0.007) of the time with diagnostic yield 15.8% versus 10.5% ( P = 0. 042), GFR was obtained 99.3% versus 98.4% (not significant) of the time with diagnostic yield 18.9% versus 13.7% ( P = 0.02), and blood cultures were obtained 23.4% versus 7.3% ( P < 0.001) of the time with diagnostic yield 7.3% versus 9.3% (not significant). Conclusion Compared with traditional triage, the team triage process increased discharges and decreased time to discharge, but did not lead to increased testing or decreased diagnostic yield.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.