2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trial time warping to discriminate stimulus-related from movement-related neural activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This circuit is usually involved in the control of voluntary skeletomotor movements and includes the supplementary motor cortex (SMA) and the putamen as the fundamental cortical and neostriatal nodes, respectively (Coull et al, 2011). Interestingly, neurophysiological studies in monkeys have also shown that the mCBGT circuit is engaged in both the perceptual and motor aspects of timing (Merchant et al, 2013a; Perez et al, 2013), as well as the control of movement sequences (Tanji, 2001). …”
Section: The Gradual Audiomotor Evolution Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This circuit is usually involved in the control of voluntary skeletomotor movements and includes the supplementary motor cortex (SMA) and the putamen as the fundamental cortical and neostriatal nodes, respectively (Coull et al, 2011). Interestingly, neurophysiological studies in monkeys have also shown that the mCBGT circuit is engaged in both the perceptual and motor aspects of timing (Merchant et al, 2013a; Perez et al, 2013), as well as the control of movement sequences (Tanji, 2001). …”
Section: The Gradual Audiomotor Evolution Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, brain oscillatory activity has been suggested as a major signal to encode the passage of time (Treisman et al, 1994). Recent imaging and neurophysiological studies have implicated the CBGT as a fundamental part of the timing mechanism in time perception (Macar et al, 2006;Harrington et al, 2010) and time production tasks in the scale of hundreds of milliseconds (Jin et al, 2009;Wiener et al, 2010), including the SCT (Rao et al, 1997;Merchant et al, 2011Merchant et al, , 2013aPerez et al, 2013). Therefore, in the present study, we investigated the dynamic changes of both the spiking responses and the ␥-and ␤-activity in LFPs of the putamen during a version of SCT with three intervals in the synchronization phase and three intervals in the continuation phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also imply that neuronal mechanisms underlying rhythm sensitivity can be studied at the cellular level in an animal model that is closely related to humans. With a few exceptions in animals (Scheich et al, 1979, 1983; Merchant et al, 2011; Perez et al, 2013), such mechanisms have been studied in humans only and with non-invasive brain imaging techniques, like EEG and fMRI. They have revealed the basal ganglia (Matell and Meck, 2004; Buhusi and Meck, 2005; Meck, 2005; Grahn and Brett, 2007; Teki et al, 2011) and several cortical areas including auditory cortex, supplementary motor cortex, anterior cingulate, and premotor cortex (Chen et al, 2008; Coull and Nobre, 2008; Grahn and McAuley, 2009; Grahn and Rowe, 2009; Geiser et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%