2001
DOI: 10.1007/s00454-001-0010-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triangles of Extremal Area or Perimeter in a Finite Planar Point Set

Abstract: Abstract. We show the following two results on a set of n points in the plane, thus answering questions posed by Erdős and Purdy [11]:1. The maximum number of triangles of maximum area (or of maximum perimeter) in a set of n points in the plane is exactly n. 2. The maximum possible number of triangles of minimum positive area in a set of n points in the plane is (n 2 ).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, these rules imply that points selected during a single round of the dot puzzle must be non-decreasing, and thus at most 2n−3 points can be selected take part in Q i . Thus Similarly, we can almost recover the result ex(n, { , , , }) ≤ n of Braß, Rote and Swanepoel [3]. Here, the rules are:…”
Section: Some Warm-up Exercisessupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, these rules imply that points selected during a single round of the dot puzzle must be non-decreasing, and thus at most 2n−3 points can be selected take part in Q i . Thus Similarly, we can almost recover the result ex(n, { , , , }) ≤ n of Braß, Rote and Swanepoel [3]. Here, the rules are:…”
Section: Some Warm-up Exercisessupporting
confidence: 55%
“…1 F:F n T2: [3] n T2:H n T2:H n T2:H n T2:H n T2:H n T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n T2: [3] n T2: [3] n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n : n 2 T2:H n T2: [3] n T2: [3] n T2:H n T2:H n T2:H n T2:H n T2:H n H:H n : n 2 T2: [2] n : n 2 T2: [2] n : n 2 T2: [2] n : n 2 T2: [2] n : n 2 T2: [2] n : n 2 T2: [2] n : n 2 T2: [2] n 2 [2]: [2] n T2: [3] n [3]: [3] n : n 2 T2: [2] n : n 2 [3]: [2] n : n 2 T2: [2] n : n 2 [3]: [2] n : n 2 T2: [2] n 2 [2]: [2] n : n 2 T2: [2] n : n 2 [3]: [2] n : n 2 T2: [2] n : n 2 [3]: [2] n : n 2 T2: [2] n : n 2 [3]: [2] n : n 2 T2: [2] [2] n : n 2 T2: [2] n : n 2 T2: [2] n : n 2 T2: [2] n : n 2 T2: [2] n : n 2 T2: [2] n : n 2 T2: [2] n 2 [...…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The currently best upper bound, O(n 44/19 ), due to Dumitrescu, Sharir and C. Tóth [15], recently improved an older O(n 7/3 ) bound of Pach and Sharir [31]. Answering further questions of Erdős and Purdy [23], Braß, Rote and Swanepoel [9] showed the following two results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The number of triangles with some extremal property might go up (significantly) when one moves up one dimension. For instance, Braß, Rote, and Swanepoel [9] have shown that the number of maximum area triangles in the plane is at most n (which is tight). In 3-space we show that this number is at least Ω(n 4/3 ) in the worst case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%